150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32306224)
1. Finite Mixture Models with Student t Distributions: an Applied Example.
Burgess-Hull AJ
Prev Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(6):872-883. PubMed ID: 32306224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing continuous non-normal skewed distributions in latent growth mixture modeling: An assessment of specification errors and class enumeration.
Depaoli S; Winter SD; Lai K; Guerra-Peña K
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):795-821. PubMed ID: 31012738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abstract: A Comparison of the Factor Mixture Model and Taxometric Procedures.
Tueller S; Lubke G
Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(4):660. PubMed ID: 26771434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Non-Normality on Extraction of Spurious Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Models.
Sen S; Cohen AS; Kim SH
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):98-113. PubMed ID: 29881041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders.
Clark SL; Muthén B; Kaprio J; D'Onofrio BM; Viken R; Rose RJ
Struct Equ Modeling; 2013 Oct; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 24302849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Latent Class Detection and Class Assignment: A Comparison of the MAXEIG Taxometric Procedure and Factor Mixture Modeling Approaches.
Lubke G; Tueller S
Struct Equ Modeling; 2010 Oct; 17(4):605-628. PubMed ID: 24648712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not quite normal: Consequences of violating the assumption of normality in regression mixture models.
Lee Van Horn M; Smith J; Fagan AA; Jaki T; Feaster DJ; Masyn K; Hawkins JD; Howe G
Struct Equ Modeling; 2012; 19(2):227-249. PubMed ID: 22754273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of and reflection on the applications of factor mixture modeling.
Kim E; Wang Y; Hsu HY
Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38127568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of a finite mixture model to somatic cell scores of Italian goats.
Boettcher PJ; Moroni P; Pisoni G; Gianola D
J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jun; 88(6):2209-16. PubMed ID: 15905450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible mixture modeling via the multivariate t distribution with the Box-Cox transformation: an alternative to the skew-t distribution.
Lo K; Gottardo R
Stat Comput; 2012 Jan; 22(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 22125375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanomechanical characterization of heterogeneous and hierarchical biomaterials and tissues using nanoindentation: the role of finite mixture models.
Zadpoor AA
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2015 Mar; 48():150-7. PubMed ID: 25579908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part I: cross-sectional models.
Hallquist MN; Wright AG
J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 24134433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the classification of migraine subtypes: an empirical approach based on factor mixture models in the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study.
Lipton RB; Serrano D; Pavlovic JM; Manack AN; Reed ML; Turkel CC; Buse DC
Headache; 2014 May; 54(5):830-49. PubMed ID: 24527745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian analysis of nonlinear mixed-effects mixture models for longitudinal data with heterogeneity and skewness.
Lu X; Huang Y
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(16):2830-49. PubMed ID: 24623529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian bivariate linear mixed-effects models with skew-normal/independent distributions, with application to AIDS clinical studies.
Huang Y; Chen R; Dagne G; Zhu Y; Chen H
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):373-96. PubMed ID: 24897242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The misuse of distributional assumptions in functional class scoring gene-set and pathway analysis.
Ho CH; Huang YJ; Lai YJ; Mukherjee R; Hsiao CK
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic algorithms for finite mixture model based voxel classification in neuroimaging.
Tohka J; Krestyannikov E; Dinov ID; Graham AM; Shattuck DW; Ruotsalainen U; Toga AW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):696-711. PubMed ID: 17518064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skew
Hohmann L; Holtmann J; Eid M
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1323. PubMed ID: 30116209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracting Spurious Latent Classes in Growth Mixture Modeling With Nonnormal Errors.
Guerra-Peña K; Steinley D
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):933-953. PubMed ID: 29795894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
