These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32306466)

  • 1. Top-down modulation of neural envelope tracking: The interplay with behavioral, self-report and neural measures of listening effort.
    Decruy L; Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 52(5):3375-3393. PubMed ID: 32306466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.
    Decruy L; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):601-615. PubMed ID: 31141449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Effortful Word Recognition on Supportive Neural Systems Measured by Alpha and Theta Power.
    Ryan DB; Eckert MA; Sellers EW; Schairer KS; McBee MT; Jones MR; Smith SL
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1549-1562. PubMed ID: 35363640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing of brain entrainment to the speech envelope during speaking, listening and self-listening.
    Pérez A; Davis MH; Ince RAA; Zhang H; Fu Z; Lamarca M; Lambon Ralph MA; Monahan PJ
    Cognition; 2022 Jul; 224():105051. PubMed ID: 35219954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. θ-Band Cortical Tracking of the Speech Envelope Shows the Linear Phase Property.
    Zou J; Xu C; Luo C; Jin P; Gao J; Li J; Gao J; Ding N; Luo B
    eNeuro; 2021; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 34380659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural tracking of attended versus ignored speech is differentially affected by hearing loss.
    Petersen EB; Wöstmann M; Obleser J; Lunner T
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 27707813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of the Sensitivity and Reliability of Multiple Measures of Listening Effort.
    Giuliani NP; Brown CJ; Wu YH
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):465-474. PubMed ID: 32925306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech.
    Müller JA; Wendt D; Kollmeier B; Debener S; Brand T
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():449. PubMed ID: 30906273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural envelope tracking as a measure of speech understanding in cochlear implant users.
    Verschueren E; Somers B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():23-31. PubMed ID: 30580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with unilateral or bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing.
    Hughes KC; Galvin KL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 23540588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.