These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32306892)

  • 1. On the utility of RNA sample pooling to optimize cost and statistical power in RNA sequencing experiments.
    Takele Assefa A; Vandesompele J; Thas O
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):312. PubMed ID: 32306892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experiments.
    Peng X; Wood CL; Blalock EM; Chen KC; Landfield PW; Stromberg AJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Jun; 4():26. PubMed ID: 12823867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Power analysis and sample size estimation for RNA-Seq differential expression.
    Ching T; Huang S; Garmire LX
    RNA; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1684-96. PubMed ID: 25246651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient experimental design and analysis strategies for the detection of differential expression using RNA-Sequencing.
    Robles JA; Qureshi SE; Stephen SJ; Wilson SR; Burden CJ; Taylor JM
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Sep; 13():484. PubMed ID: 22985019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental validation of methods for differential gene expression analysis and sample pooling in RNA-seq.
    Rajkumar AP; Qvist P; Lazarus R; Lescai F; Ju J; Nyegaard M; Mors O; Børglum AD; Li Q; Christensen JH
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Jul; 16(1):548. PubMed ID: 26208977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of pooling mRNA in microarray class comparisons.
    Shih JH; Michalowska AM; Dobbin K; Ye Y; Qiu TH; Green JE
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3318-25. PubMed ID: 15247103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LPEseq: Local-Pooled-Error Test for RNA Sequencing Experiments with a Small Number of Replicates.
    Gim J; Won S; Park T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0159182. PubMed ID: 27532300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size calculations for the differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data using a negative binomial regression model.
    Li X; Wu D; Cooper NGF; Rai SN
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 30667368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3'Pool-seq: an optimized cost-efficient and scalable method of whole-transcriptome gene expression profiling.
    Sholder G; Lanz TA; Moccia R; Quan J; Aparicio-Prat E; Stanton R; Xi HS
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):64. PubMed ID: 31959126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of pooling samples on the efficiency of comparative studies using microarrays.
    Zhang SD; Gant TW
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(24):4378-83. PubMed ID: 16234321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RNA-seq differential expression studies: more sequence or more replication?
    Liu Y; Zhou J; White KP
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 30(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 24319002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation, power evaluation and sample size recommendation for single-cell RNA-seq.
    Su K; Wu Z; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(19):4860-4868. PubMed ID: 32614380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Vacc-SeqQC project: Benchmarking RNA-Seq for clinical vaccine studies.
    Goll JB; Bosinger SE; Jensen TL; Walum H; Grimes T; Tharp GK; Natrajan MS; Blazevic A; Head RD; Gelber CE; Steenbergen KJ; Patel NB; Sanz P; Rouphael NG; Anderson EJ; Mulligan MJ; Hoft DF
    Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1093242. PubMed ID: 36741404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments.
    Bi R; Liu P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():146. PubMed ID: 27029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of adaptive filtering on power and false discovery rate in RNA-seq experiments.
    Zehetmayer S; Posch M; Graf A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):388. PubMed ID: 36153479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
    Li X; Brock GN; Rouchka EC; Cooper NGF; Wu D; O'Toole TE; Gill RS; Eteleeb AM; O'Brien L; Rai SN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176185. PubMed ID: 28459823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies.
    Schmid KT; Höllbacher B; Cruceanu C; Böttcher A; Lickert H; Binder EB; Theis FJ; Heinig M
    Nat Commun; 2021 Nov; 12(1):6625. PubMed ID: 34785648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pooling mRNA in microarray experiments and its effect on power.
    Zhang W; Carriquiry A; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 23(10):1217-24. PubMed ID: 17344238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of strategies for generating artificial replicates in RNA-seq experiments.
    Saremi B; Gusmag F; Distl O; Schaarschmidt F; Metzger J; Becker S; Jung K
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7170. PubMed ID: 35505053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A statistical framework for the design of microarray experiments and effective detection of differential gene expression.
    Zhang SD; Gant TW
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2821-8. PubMed ID: 15180939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.