BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32307272)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Unenhanced MRI, and Their Combination in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer: A Multi-reader Study.
    Girometti R; Sardanelli F; Marconi V; Bondini F; De Serio I; Bracciani A; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 32307272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI versus the combination of unenhanced MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Girometti R; Marconi V; Linda A; Di Mico L; Bondini F; Zuiani C; Sardanelli F
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():174-182. PubMed ID: 31838292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer staging: Combined digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Tomkova L; Cereser L; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():188-195. PubMed ID: 30292265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative Staging in Breast Cancer: Intraindividual Comparison of Unenhanced MRI Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI.
    Rizzo V; Moffa G; Kripa E; Caramanico C; Pediconi F; Galati F
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():661945. PubMed ID: 34017683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
    Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
    Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI.
    Förnvik D; Kataoka M; Iima M; Ohashi A; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3194-3203. PubMed ID: 29460074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results.
    Ramli Hamid MT; Ab Mumin N; Abdul Hamid S; Ahmad Saman MS; Rahmat K
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Apr; 79(4):e524-e531. PubMed ID: 38267349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Mariscotti G; Houssami N; Durando M; Bergamasco L; Campanino PP; Ruggieri C; Regini E; Luparia A; Bussone R; Sapino A; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Mar; 34(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 24596363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.