154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32307327)
1. Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions.
Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Marks LS; Sonn GA; Natarajan S; Fan RE; Gross MD; Mauer E; Banerjee S; Hectors S; Carlsson S; Margolis DJ; Hu JC
Urol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 38(7):637.e9-637.e15. PubMed ID: 32307327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.
Chiu PK; Leow JJ; Chiang CH; Mok A; Zhang K; Hsieh PF; Zhu Y; Lam W; Tsang WC; Fan YH; Lin TP; Chan TY; Leung CH; Teoh JY; Chu PS; Zhu G; Ye DW; Wu HC; Tan TW; Tsu JH; Ng CF; Chiong E; Huang CY
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 37036248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score.
Shaish H; Casals R; Ahmed F; Makkar J; Wenske S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 32312102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of clinically signifi cant prostate cancer with PIRADS v2 scores, PSA density, and ADC values in regions with and without mpMRI visible lesions.
Westphalen AC; Fazel F; Nguyen H; Cabarrus M; Hanley-Knutson K; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):713-723. PubMed ID: 31136112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of prostate cancer for men with prior negative biopsies undergoing magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy-naive men: A prospective evaluation of the PLUM cohort.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Bhanji Y; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Gupta GN
Cancer; 2022 Jan; 128(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 34427930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biparametric Quantitative MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Uyanik M; Vigneswaran HT; Hale GR; Gann P; Magin R; Abern MR
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 32(6):66-72. PubMed ID: 38051029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA <10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 = 3 lesions.
Hu C; Sun J; Xu Z; Zhang Z; Zhou Q; Xu J; Chen H; Wang C; Ouyang J
Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):2560-2571. PubMed ID: 35920264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary?
Felker ER; Raman SS; Margolis DJ; Lu DSK; Shaheen N; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 28858541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of LacdiNAc-glycosylated Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Predicting Pathological Findings of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Image-guided Prostate Biopsy for the Patients With Highest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category ≥3.
Shoji S; Kaya T; Tanaka Y; Uemura K; Kusaka T; Takahashi K; Yuzuriha S; Kano T; Hanada I; Umemoto T; Ogawa T; Nakano M; Kawakami M; Nitta M; Hasegawa M; Hashida K; Hasebe T; Kaneko T; Okada J; Asai S; Miyajima A
J Urol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):187-197. PubMed ID: 36067387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
