These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308032)

  • 1. Q-Matrix Estimation Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models: Based on Partial Known Q-Matrix.
    Wang D; Cai Y; Tu D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020 Apr; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 32308032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications.
    Chen J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jun; 41(4):277-293. PubMed ID: 29881093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation.
    Qin H; Guo L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1916-1935. PubMed ID: 37231327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Semi-supervised Learning Method for Q-Matrix Specification Under the DINA and DINO Model With Independent Structure.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Wang T; Gao P; Xiong J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2120. PubMed ID: 33013538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multiple logistic regression-based (MLR-B) Q-matrix validation method for cognitive diagnosis models:A confirmatory approach.
    Tu D; Chiu J; Ma W; Wang D; Cai Y; Ouyang X
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2080-2092. PubMed ID: 35819718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data-driven Q-matrix learning based on Boolean matrix factorization in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Xiong J; Luo Z; Luo G; Yu X
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):638-667. PubMed ID: 35578396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):727-753. PubMed ID: 32655181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Students' Translation Competence: Integrating China's Standards of English With Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Approaches.
    Mei H; Chen H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():872025. PubMed ID: 35432110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypothesis Testing of the Q-matrix.
    Gu Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29998451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):268-91. PubMed ID: 25496248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades.
    Li Y; Zhen M; Liu J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():786612. PubMed ID: 34975681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 30456748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.