These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308126)
1. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial. Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless. Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of transfemoral prosthetic socket interface design on gait, balance, mobility, and preference: A randomized clinical trial. Kahle JT; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter MR; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Swanson AE; Highsmith MJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Aug; 45(4):304-312. PubMed ID: 33856157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation. Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Anderst W; Fiedler G; Onishi K; McKernan G; Gale T; Paulus P Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):299. PubMed ID: 35413866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coronal plane socket stability during gait in persons with transfemoral amputation: Pilot study. Fatone S; Dillon M; Stine R; Tillges R J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(8):1217-28. PubMed ID: 25629691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket. Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets. PaternĂ² L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marker-based method to measure movement between the residual limb and a transtibial prosthetic socket. Childers WL; Siebert S Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):720-728. PubMed ID: 26527758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study. Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in quality of life of transfemoral amputees: Comparison between 2 types of transfemoral sockets and their influence on functionality and user comfort - A case report. Bartolomeu N; Gonzalez J; Valentim F; Reis E Silva M; Ramos N; Jacinto J Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Jun; 48(3):344-347. PubMed ID: 37708337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees. Gailey R; Kristal A; Lucarevic J; Harris S; Applegate B; Gaunaurd I Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 30095355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Hybrid Subischial Socket for Persons With Transfemoral Amputation: Gait Parameters and Clinical Assessment of a Case Series. Pellegrini R; Denza G; Brunelli S; Zenardi D; Imperio M; Vannozzi G; Traballesi M Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2021; 4(1):36252. PubMed ID: 37614930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee. Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Prosthetic Socket Design on Residual Femur Motion Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray - A Preliminary Analysis. Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Loan JP; Bradley KM; D'Andrea SE Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():697651. PubMed ID: 34447740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]