178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308303)
1. Comparison Efficiency of Posteroanterior Cephalometry and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Detecting Craniofacial Asymmetry: A Systematic Review.
Yousefi F; Rafiei E; Mahdian M; Mollabashi V; Saboonchi SS; Hosseini SM
Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):358-371. PubMed ID: 32308303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review.
Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Caltabiano M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 18302479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of healing assessments of periapical endodontic surgery using conventional radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: A systematic review.
Sharma G; Abraham D; Gupta A; Aggarwal V; Mehta N; Jala S; Chauhan P; Singh A
Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Mar; 52(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35387097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Pittayapat P; Limchaichana-Bolstad N; Willems G; Jacobs R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 24373559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review.
Tadinada A; Marczak A; Yadav S; Mukherjee PM
Turk J Orthod; 2016 Sep; 29(3):73-79. PubMed ID: 30112478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study.
Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21459833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asymmetry assessment using cone beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison.
Sievers MM; Larson BE; Gaillard PR; Wey A
Angle Orthod; 2012 May; 82(3):410-7. PubMed ID: 21978416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Na ER; Aljawad H; Lee KM; Hwang HS
Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 30603624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial intelligence: is it more accurate than endodontists in root canal therapy?
Murad M; Tamimi F
Evid Based Dent; 2023 Sep; 24(3):106-107. PubMed ID: 37221364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental and clinical assessment of three-dimensional cephalometry: a systematic review.
Smektała T; Jędrzejewski M; Szyndel J; Sporniak-Tutak K; Olszewski R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 25037877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ferreira JB; Christovam IO; Alencar DS; da Motta AFJ; Mattos CT; Cury-Saramago A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20160455. PubMed ID: 28362170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of three methods for constructing craniofacial mid-sagittal plane based on the cone beam computed tomography].
Wang SW; Li M; Yang HF; Zhao YJ; Wang Y; Liu Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Apr; 48(2):330-5. PubMed ID: 27080291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging versus cone beam computed tomography in diagnosis of periapical pathosis - A systematic review.
N KK; Merwade S; Prabakaran P; C H LP; B S A; C N G
Saudi Dent J; 2021 Dec; 33(8):784-794. PubMed ID: 34938018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics.
van Vlijmen OJ; Kuijpers MA; Bergé SJ; Schols JG; Maal TJ; Breuning H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Mar; 143(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 22383204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does cone-beam computed tomography examination increase the micronuclei frequency in the oral mucosa exfoliated cells? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang P; Xuan B; Li G; Qi S
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 36841769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
