These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308334)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Self-adjusting File and WaveOne File: An
    Bakthavatchalam B; Ranjani MS; Amudhalakshmi K
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):542-547. PubMed ID: 32308334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of canal cleanliness at apical third using Self-Adjusting File and Wave One File with different irrigants: an
    Bakthavatchalam B; Ranjani MS; Amudhalakshmi K; Dhanalakshmi S
    Med Pharm Rep; 2023 Jan; 96(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 36818323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison and evaluation of two reciprocating root canal instruments on removal of smear layer by using two irrigants at apical one-third of the root canal-an ex vivo-scanning electron microscopic study.
    Jimna MM; Ashwini TS; Sowmya HK
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):451-458. PubMed ID: 29430100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.
    Farmakis ET; Sotiropoulos GG; Abràmovitz I; Solomonov M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2131-2138. PubMed ID: 26759337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
    Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Azimian S; Bakhtiar H; Azimi S; Esnaashari E
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2019; 16(3):179-184. PubMed ID: 31040874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparative Study on the Shaping Ability and Cleaning Efficiency of Two Different Single-File Systems, Reciprocating Wave One Versus Continuous Rotation F360, Evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscope: An In Vitro Study.
    Samudrala A; Majeti C; Chowdary KH; Potru LB; Yaragani A; Kumar YP; Sidhu GK; Kathuria NS
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37503. PubMed ID: 37187639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of S-One and WaveOne File Systems Using Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis: An
    Ramachandran SS; Koshy CR; Narayanan S; Venkatesh B; Sundaran RM; Karumaran CS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):841-845. PubMed ID: 33568602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Push-out bond strength of root fillings made with C-Point and BC sealer versus gutta-percha and AH Plus after the instrumentation of oval canals with the Self-Adjusting File versus WaveOne.
    Pawar AM; Pawar S; Kfir A; Pawar M; Kokate S
    Int Endod J; 2016 Apr; 49(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 25827240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self-adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal.
    Çapar İD; Aydinbelge HA
    Scanning; 2014; 36(6):640-7. PubMed ID: 25285423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro canal and isthmus debris removal of the self-adjusting file, K3, and WaveOne files in the mesial root of human mandibular molars.
    Dietrich MA; Kirkpatrick TC; Yaccino JM
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1140-4. PubMed ID: 22794223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy using Four Novel Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kar PP; Khasnis SA; Kidiyoor KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 29208788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher file on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation].
    Xin Y; Yang J; Song KY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 30854818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness in primary molars after preparation with Self-Adjusting-File (SAF) or Mtwo NiTi-instruments and final irrigation.
    Baxter S; Phan KM; Hülsmann M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2021; 22(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 33719476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of canal cleaning ability of various rotary endodontic filesin apical third: A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Jadhav GR; Mittal P; Kulkarni A; Syed S; Bagul R; Elahi S; Kalra D
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(6):508-514. PubMed ID: 28182065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.
    Alakshar A; Saleh ARM; Gorduysus MO
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 32777834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.