BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308873)

  • 1. Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.
    Ruhl GL; Hazel JW; Clayton EW; Malin BA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():774-783. PubMed ID: 32308873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.
    Stewart KFJ; Kokole D; Wesselius A; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP; de Vries H; van Osch LADM
    Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 30359983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
    Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "I would rather have it done by a doctor"-laypeople's perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.
    Schaper M; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
    Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Mar; 22(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 29705970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies tell their customers to 'see a genetic counselor'. How do genetic counselors feel about direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
    Hsieh V; Braid T; Gordon E; Hercher L
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):191-197. PubMed ID: 32706156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult adoptees and their use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Searching for family, searching for health.
    Lee H; Vogel RI; LeRoy B; Zierhut HA
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):144-157. PubMed ID: 32602181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Policy in Korea Based on Consumer Preference.
    Jeong G
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 28817817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.
    Yin Z; Song L; Clayton EW; Malin BA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238644. PubMed ID: 32898148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How to Approach Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing With Your Patients.
    Renkes EM; Flanagan J; Deberg K; Bell M
    S D Med; 2022 Nov; 75(11):518-520. PubMed ID: 36893031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.
    Hazel JW; Slobogin C
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2018; 28(1):35-66. PubMed ID: 30840416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.
    Roberts JS; Gornick MC; Carere DA; Uhlmann WR; Ruffin MT; Green RC
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 28068660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Data Privacy: Key Concerns and Recommendations Based on Consumer Perspectives.
    Hendricks-Sturrup RM; Lu CY
    J Pers Med; 2019 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31075859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.
    Schaper M; Schicktanz S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):56. PubMed ID: 29871685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.
    Brett GR; Metcalfe SA; Amor DJ; Halliday JL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 20(8):825-30. PubMed ID: 22317975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals.
    McGrath SP; Walton N; Williams MS; Kim KK; Bastola K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):844. PubMed ID: 31760949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the consulting room].
    Gerrits EM; van Dooren MF; Bredenoord AL; van Mil MHW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2019 Nov; 163():. PubMed ID: 32073784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The dawn of consumer-directed testing.
    Ramos E; Weissman SM
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2018 Mar; 178(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 29512889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "It's our DNA, we deserve the right to test!" A content analysis of a petition for the right to access direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    Su Y; Borry P; Otte IC; Howard HC
    Per Med; 2013 Sep; 10(7):729-739. PubMed ID: 29768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark-public knowledge, use, and attitudes.
    Gerdes AM; Nicolaisen L; Husum E; Andersen JB; Gantzhorn MD; Roos L; Diness BR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 May; 29(5):851-860. PubMed ID: 33649540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms.
    Laestadius LI; Rich JR; Auer PL
    Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 27657678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.