189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32308878)
21. Deep learning for cell image segmentation and ranking.
Araújo FHD; Silva RRV; Ushizima DM; Rezende MT; Carneiro CM; Campos Bianchi AG; Medeiros FNS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2019 Mar; 72():13-21. PubMed ID: 30763802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Debris removal in Pap-smear images.
Malm P; Balakrishnan BN; Sujathan VK; Kumar R; Bengtsson E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Jul; 111(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 23582663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.
Karnon J; Peters J; Platt J; Chilcott J; McGoogan E; Brewer N
Health Technol Assess; 2004 May; 8(20):iii, 1-78. PubMed ID: 15147611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A contour property based approach to segment nuclei in cervical cytology images.
Hoque IT; Ibtehaz N; Chakravarty S; Rahman MS; Rahman MS
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Jan; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 33509110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of PathTezt™, a Liquid-Based Cytology System.
Mohd Nafis NS; Mat Zin AA
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Oct; 22(10):3261-3266. PubMed ID: 34711003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Liquid-based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?
Moseley RP; Paget S
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 11952745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metastatic breast cancer diagnosed on cervical cytology.
Yuan L; Oshilaja O; Sierk A; Zhang G; Booth CN; Brainard J; Dyhdalo KS
Cytopathology; 2021 Jan; 32(1):127-131. PubMed ID: 32789952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
Osamura RY
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 30755214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Segmentation of Papanicolaou smear images.
Lin YK; Fu KS
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 7294539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CervixFormer: A Multi-scale swin transformer-Based cervical pap-Smear WSI classification framework.
Khan A; Han S; Ilyas N; Lee YM; Lee B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107718. PubMed ID: 37451230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevalence of Abnormal Cervical Cytology in HIVNegative Women Participating in a Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Calmette Hospital, Cambodia.
Hav M; Eav S; Heang N; Pich P; Lim D; Leang V; Korn A; Lay S; Pluot M; Kruy L
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3101-3. PubMed ID: 27509936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.
Nanda K; McCrory DC; Myers ER; Bastian LA; Hasselblad V; Hickey JD; Matchar DB
Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(10):810-9. PubMed ID: 10819705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accurate Cervical Cell Segmentation from Overlapping Clumps in Pap Smear Images.
Song Y; Tan EL; Jiang X; Cheng JZ; Ni D; Chen S; Lei B; Wang T
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Jan; 36(1):288-300. PubMed ID: 27623573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enhancing cervical cancer detection and robust classification through a fusion of deep learning models.
Mathivanan SK; Francis D; Srinivasan S; Khatavkar V; P K; Shah MA
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10812. PubMed ID: 38734714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Efficacy of modified rapid economic acetic acid-based Papanicolaou stain.
Bhagat P; Susheilia S; Singh K; Sadhukhan S; Rajwanshi A; Dey P
Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):452-455. PubMed ID: 27019215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic screening of exfoliated cervical cells with standard Papanicolaou screening.
Fung Kee Fung M; Senterman M; Eid P; Faught W; Mikhael NZ; Wong PT
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jul; 66(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9234913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
