224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32309662)
1. Comparison of outcomes following minimally invasive and open posterior cervical foraminotomy: description of minimally invasive technique and review of literature.
Platt A; Gerard CS; O'Toole JE
J Spine Surg; 2020 Mar; 6(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 32309662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Platt A; Fessler RG; Traynelis VC; O'Toole JE
Global Spine J; 2022 Sep; 12(7):1573-1582. PubMed ID: 34879736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Via Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Approach for Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Wu PF; Li YW; Wang B; Jiang B; Tu ZM; Lv GH
Pain Physician; 2019 Jan; 22(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 30700067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques.
McAnany SJ; Kim JS; Overley SC; Baird EO; Anderson PA; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):849-56. PubMed ID: 25623079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.
Dunn C; Moore J; Sahai N; Issa K; Faloon M; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Emami A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):358-364. PubMed ID: 29957145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.
Zou T; Wang PC; Chen H; Feng XM; Sun HH
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3609-3618. PubMed ID: 36255547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.
Skovrlj B; Gologorsky Y; Haque R; Fessler RG; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2405-11. PubMed ID: 24486472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.
Changoor S; Farshchian J; Patel N; Coban D; Abdelmalek G; Sinha K; Hwang K; Emami A
Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):800-806. PubMed ID: 38185140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.
Zhang C; Wu J; Xu C; Zheng W; Pan Y; Li C; Zhou Y
Pain Physician; 2018 May; 21(3):E215-E223. PubMed ID: 29871377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications of Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wu PF; Liu BH; Wang B; Li YW; Dai YL; Qing YL; Lv GH
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():217-227. PubMed ID: 29602008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic versus Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Disc Disease.
Kang MS; You KH; Han SY; Park SM; Choi JY; Park HJ
Clin Orthop Surg; 2022 Dec; 14(4):539-547. PubMed ID: 36518925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Freiburg Experience With 34 Patients.
Peto I; Scheiwe C; Kogias E; Hubbe U
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1419-E1425. PubMed ID: 28234772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis.
Mansfield HE; Canar WJ; Gerard CS; O'Toole JE
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Nov; 37(5):E9. PubMed ID: 25491887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: An Outcome Comparison With the Full-endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.
Zhong Z; Hu Q; Huang L; Zhang S; Zhou M
Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 37559217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of brachialgia: the Leeds spinal unit experience (2008-2013).
Selvanathan SK; Beagrie C; Thomson S; Corns R; Deniz K; Derham C; Towns G; Timothy J; Pal D
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2015 Sep; 157(9):1595-600. PubMed ID: 26144567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review.
Liu WJ; Hu L; Chou PH; Wang JW; Kan WS
Orthop Surg; 2016 Nov; 8(4):425-431. PubMed ID: 28032703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microsurgery or open cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy? A systematic review.
Song Z; Zhang Z; Hao J; Shen J; Zhou N; Xu S; Ni W; Hu Z
Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1335-43. PubMed ID: 27112948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.
Burkhardt BW; Oertel JM
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Feb; 18(2):E41. PubMed ID: 31245821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Keyhole Foraminotomy via a Percutaneous Posterior Full-endoscopic Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy: An Advanced Procedure and Clinical Study.
Luo RJ; Song Y; Liao ZW; Yin HP; Zhan SF; Lu SD; Chen C; Yang C
Curr Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 40(6):1170-1176. PubMed ID: 33428146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Channel-assisted cervical key hole technology combined with ultrasonic bone osteotome versus posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy: a clinical retrospective study.
Sun X; Wang C; Kong Q; Zhang B; Feng P; Liu J; Hu Y; Ma J; Xiang J
Int Orthop; 2024 Feb; 48(2):547-553. PubMed ID: 37782331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
