BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32309889)

  • 1. Superb Microvascular Imaging Improves Detection of Vascularity in Indeterminate Renal Masses.
    Leong JY; Wessner CE; Kramer MR; Forsberg F; Halpern EJ; Lyshchik A; Torkzaban M; Morris A; Byrne K; VanMeter M; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Eisenbrey JR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32309889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeing the Unseen: Evaluating Testicular Vascularity in Neonates by Using the Superb Microvascular Imaging Ultrasound Technique.
    Ayaz E; Ayaz M; Önal C; Yıkılmaz A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1847-1854. PubMed ID: 30548880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between the superb microvascular imaging technique and conventional Doppler ultrasound in evaluating chronic allograft damage in renal transplant recipients.
    Gürbüz AF; Keven A; Elmalı A; Toru S; Apaydın A; Çeken K
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Mar; 29(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 36960635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Superb Microvascular Imaging With Other Doppler Methods in Assessment of Testicular Vascularity in Cryptorchidism.
    Keçeli M; Keskin Z; Keskin S
    Ultrasound Q; 2020 Dec; 36(4):363-370. PubMed ID: 32956243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and High Sensitive Doppler for Monitoring Outcomes of Uterine Artery Embolization.
    Machado P; Gillmore K; Tan A; Gonsalves C; Forsberg F
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S211-S219. PubMed ID: 37330354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.
    Xiao XY; Chen X; Guan XF; Wu H; Qin W; Luo BM
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160546. PubMed ID: 27529640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) compared with conventional ultrasound for evaluating thyroid nodules.
    Lu R; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhao W; Wang X; Jin M; Guo R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Dec; 17(1):65. PubMed ID: 29281991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses.
    Diao X; Zhan J; Chen L; Chen Y; Cao H
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 32863154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of superb micro-vascular imaging (SMI) and conventional Doppler imaging techniques for evaluating testicular blood flow.
    Durmaz MS; Sivri M
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jul; 45(3):443-452. PubMed ID: 29248966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Ovarian Vascularity in Children by Using the "Superb Microvascular Imaging" Ultrasound Technique in Comparison With Conventional Doppler Ultrasound Techniques.
    Ayaz E; Aslan A; İnan İ; Yıkılmaz A
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Oct; 38(10):2751-2760. PubMed ID: 30919993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the Superb Microvascular Imaging Method in the Distinction of Intraductal Papilloma and Duct Ectasia With Secretion.
    Tek C; Öztekin PS; Celepli P; Uçar F; Koşar PN
    J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Feb; 40(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 32681668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visibility of the graft hepatic artery using superb microvascular imaging in liver transplantation recipients: initial experience.
    Jang HY; Kim KW; Kim SY; Kim JS; Choi SH; Kim SY; Lee SG
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29430938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Novel Microvascular Flow Technique: Initial Results in Thyroids.
    Machado P; Segal S; Lyshchik A; Forsberg F
    Ultrasound Q; 2016 Mar; 32(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 25900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additional value of superb microvascular imaging of ultrasound examinations to evaluate focal liver lesions.
    Jeon SK; Lee JY; Kang HJ; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110332. PubMed ID: 35552066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additional value of superb microvascular imaging for assessing hepatic arterial blood flow after pediatric liver transplantation.
    Gu LH; Fang H; Liu XS; Xia Q; Li FH
    Pediatr Transplant; 2020 Nov; 24(7):e13785. PubMed ID: 32871039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology-pathology correlation in staging of liver fibrosis using superb microvascular imaging.
    Balık AÖ; Kılıçoğlu ZG; Görmez A; Özkara S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Sep; 25(5):331-337. PubMed ID: 31287429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonographic Detection of Vascularity of Focal Breast Lesions: Microvascular Imaging Versus Conventional Color and Power Doppler Imaging.
    Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Schillaci MI; Spatafora L; Marco MD; Matranga D; Firenze A; Cirino A; Ienzi R
    Ultrason Imaging; 2021 Sep; 43(5):273-281. PubMed ID: 34236008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Superb Microvascular Imaging With Color Flow and Power Doppler Imaging of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas.
    Dubinsky TJ; Revels J; Wang S; Toia G; Sonneborn R; Hippe DS; Erpelding T
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2915-2924. PubMed ID: 29683199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Superb Microvascular Imaging for the differentiation of intraductal breast lesions.
    Bakdik S; Arslan S; Oncu F; Durmaz MS; Altunkeser A; Eryilmaz MA; Unlu Y
    Med Ultrason; 2018 Aug; 20(3):306-312. PubMed ID: 30167583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Superb microvascular imaging is a rational choice for accurate Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses.
    Mu J; Mao Y; Li F; Xin X; Zhang S
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 92(1099):20181038. PubMed ID: 31067075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.