These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3231011)
1. Genetic testing: the legal position of relatives of test subjects. Gevers JK Med Law; 1988; 7(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 3231011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical and legal implications of the new genetics: issues for discussion. Wertz DC Soc Sci Med; 1992 Aug; 35(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 1519102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent when taking genetic decisions. Conti A; Delbon P; Sirignano A Med Law; 2004; 23(2):337-53. PubMed ID: 15270473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians' legal duties regarding the use of genetic tests to predict and diagnose Alzheimer disease. Kapp MB J Leg Med; 2000 Dec; 21(4):445-75. PubMed ID: 11194569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of state laws to protect genetic information. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2001 Aug; 345(5):385-8. PubMed ID: 11484711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To know or not to know. Legal perspectives on genetic privacy and disclosure of an individual's genetic profile. Fedder RS J Leg Med; 2000 Dec; 21(4):557-92. PubMed ID: 11194572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The new genetics: legal and ethical implications for medicine. Skene L; Charlesworth M Med J Aust; 1996 Sep; 165(6):301-3. PubMed ID: 8862326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Genetic counseling in congenital long QT syndrome]. Hamang A; Solberg B; Bjorvatn C; Greve G; Øyen N Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Jun; 129(12):1226-9. PubMed ID: 19521446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The conflict of understanding the genetic make-up of man and his knowledge of it. Taupitz J Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Sep; 113(1-3):477-82. PubMed ID: 10978664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ethical imperative: genetics education for physicians and patients. Kegley JA Med Law; 2003; 22(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 12889647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confused legal and medical policy: the misconceptions of genetic screening. Kegley JA Med Law; 2000; 19(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10994210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Guideline of the Gendiagnostik Kommission (GEKO) for genetic screening of consent incapable persons in accordance with 14 in connection with 23 Abs. 2 No. 1c GenDG. The 26 July 2011 version released and implemented 27 July 2011]. Gendiagnostik Kommission (GEKO) Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1257-61. PubMed ID: 22015799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [First guidelines of the German Genetic Diagnostic Commission]. Tönnies H Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1145-6. PubMed ID: 22015785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The routinization of prenatal testing. Suter SM Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(2-3):233-70. PubMed ID: 12197464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal implications of genetic testing. Scanlon C RN; 1998 Mar; 61(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 9544096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the limits of the 'joint account' model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment. Foster C; Herring J; Boyd M J Med Ethics; 2015 May; 41(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 24965717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioethics for clinicians: 14. Ethics and genetics in medicine. Burgess MM; Laberge CM; Knoppers BM CMAJ; 1998 May; 158(10):1309-13. PubMed ID: 9614824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]