These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32311064)

  • 1. Pedestrian Detection During Vehicle Backing Maneuvers Using Ultrasonic Parking Sensors.
    Matsui Y; Hosokawa N; Oikawa S
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2019 Nov; 63():343-358. PubMed ID: 32311064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedestrian Detection before Motor Vehicle Moving Off Maneuvers using Ultrasonic Sensors in the Vehicle Front.
    Matsui Y; Oikawa S
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2021 Nov; 65():163-187. PubMed ID: 35512788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of rearview cameras and rear parking sensors on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 28394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visibility of children behind 2010-2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors.
    Kidd DG; Brethwaite A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 May; 66():158-67. PubMed ID: 24556585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-world effects of rear cross-traffic alert on police-reported backing crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():350-355. PubMed ID: 30580146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-world evaluation of the effectiveness of reversing camera and parking sensor technologies in preventing backover pedestrian injuries.
    Keall MD; Fildes B; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):39-43. PubMed ID: 27865139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-world effects of rear automatic braking and other backing assistance systems.
    Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():41-47. PubMed ID: 30876519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Buick Lucerne drivers' experiences with rear parking sensors.
    Cicchino JB; Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 24874650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of a rearview camera and parking sensor system alone and combined for preventing a collision with an unexpected stationary or moving object.
    Kidd DG; Hagoski BK; Tucker TG; Chiang DP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):689-700. PubMed ID: 25977326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Technology on Drivers' Behavior during Backing Maneuvers.
    Matsui Y; Oikawa S
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():269-289. PubMed ID: 33636007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers.
    Kidd DG; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Feb; 87():92-101. PubMed ID: 26656150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between pedestrian detection specifications of parking sensor and potential safety benefits.
    Kikuchi K; Hashimoto H; Hosokawa T; Nawata K; Hirao A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105951. PubMed ID: 33360876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Backing collisions: a study of drivers' eye and backing behaviour using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems.
    Hurwitz DS; Pradhan A; Fisher DL; Knodler MA; Muttart JW; Menon R; Meissner U
    Inj Prev; 2010 Apr; 16(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 20363812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of collision damage mitigation braking systems and their effects on human injury in the event of car-to-pedestrian accidents.
    Matsui Y; Han Y; Mizuno K
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2011 Nov; 55():461-78. PubMed ID: 22869318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential benefit of sensor system field-of-view and range in pedestrian automated emergency braking systems.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 34469208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supervision of young children in parking lots: Impact on child pedestrian safety.
    Rouse JB; Schwebel DC
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():201-206. PubMed ID: 31847996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Vehicles and Pedestrian Safety: Exploring the Promise and Limits of Pedestrian Detection.
    Combs TS; Sandt LS; Clamann MP; McDonald NC
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 56(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30337236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of Pedestrian Fractures in Collisions Between Small Cars and Pedestrians Based on Surveillance Videos.
    Miao Q; Zhang YL; Yang XA; Miao QF; Zhao WD; Tong F; Lan FC; Li DR
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2022 Mar; 43(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 34510055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?
    Li G; Wang F; Otte D; Cai Z; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():143-150. PubMed ID: 29571012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in child pedestrian injury events by location.
    Agran PF; Winn DG; Anderson CL
    Pediatrics; 1994 Feb; 93(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 8121742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.