These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32311137)

  • 1. The Legal Challenge of Abortion Stigma-and Government Restrictions on the Practice of Medicine.
    Fox D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Mar; 50(2):13-15. PubMed ID: 32311137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2.
    Rosen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2020 Sep; 383(12):1101-1103. PubMed ID: 32937044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
    Kapp MB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restricting Reasons: A New Battleground in Abortion Regulation.
    Will JF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Sep; 50(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 33095492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
    Harrison LK; Naylor KL
    Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go.
    Halloran L
    US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
    Bazzelle RY
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politics of abortion: a historical perspective.
    McKeegan M
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8274866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.