262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32311514)
1. Writing to template: Researchers' negotiation of procedural research ethics.
Chiumento A; Rahman A; Frith L
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 255():112980. PubMed ID: 32311514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse researchers' perspectives on research ethics in China.
Gu C; Ye M; Wang X; Yang M; Wang H; Khoshnood K
Nurs Ethics; 2019 May; 26(3):798-808. PubMed ID: 28812946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Mwaka E; Horn L
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):307-317. PubMed ID: 31378129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study.
Xu A; Baysari MT; Stocker SL; Leow LJ; Day RO; Carland JE
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):93. PubMed ID: 33008387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Researchers' perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis.
McRae AD; Bennett C; Brown JB; Weijer C; Boruch R; Brehaut J; Chaudhry S; Donner A; Eccles M; Grimshaw J; Zwarenstein M; Taljaard M
Trials; 2013 Jan; 14():1. PubMed ID: 23286245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations of researchers conducting pediatric clinical drug trials: a qualitative survey in two Belgian university children's hospitals.
Van Hoof W; Meesters K; Dossche L; Christiaens D; De Bruyne P; Vande Walle J
Eur J Pediatr; 2018 Jul; 177(7):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 29679141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
Moodley K; Singh S
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.
Birchley G; Huxtable R; Murtagh M; Ter Meulen R; Flach P; Gooberman-Hill R
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):23. PubMed ID: 28376811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research Ethics Committees' Oversight of Biomedical Research in South Africa: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Issues Raised During Ethics Review of Non-Expedited Protocols.
Silaigwana B; Wassenaar D
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Apr; 14(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 30678521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical framework for the detection, management and communication of incidental findings in imaging studies, building on an interview study of researchers' practices and perspectives.
Bunnik EM; van Bodegom L; Pinxten W; de Beaufort ID; Vernooij MW
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):10. PubMed ID: 28166795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices.
Gibson BE; Stasiulis E; Gutfreund S; McDonald M; Dade L
J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):504-9. PubMed ID: 21636608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A chronological discourse analysis of ancillary care provision in guidance documents for research conduct in the global south.
Kapumba BM; Desmond N; Seeley J
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 May; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35568960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
Dawson L; Kass NE
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ethics in participatory research-reflection on challenges and possible impairments for participants].
Schaefer I; Narimani P
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2021 Feb; 64(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 33377989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Novice Researchers' Views About Online Ethics Education and the Instructional Design Components that May Foster Ethical Practice.
Barak M; Green G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1403-1421. PubMed ID: 31872364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research ethics in practice: An analysis of ethical issues encountered in qualitative health research with mental health service users and relatives.
Potthoff S; Hempeler C; Gather J; Gieselmann A; Vollmann J; Scholten M
Med Health Care Philos; 2023 Dec; 26(4):517-527. PubMed ID: 37639076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members.
Hokke S; Hackworth NJ; Bennetts SK; Nicholson JM; Keyzer P; Lucke J; Zion L; Crawford SB
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020; 15(1-2):12-27. PubMed ID: 31195884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigating Informed Consent Requirements and Expectations in Cluster Randomized Trials: Research Ethics Board Members' and Researchers' Views.
Ho A; Joolaee S; McDonald M; Grant D; White MM; Longstaff H; Palsson E
Ethics Hum Res; 2023; 45(6):31-45. PubMed ID: 37988275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
