246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32311750)
1. Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study.
Aly P; Mohsen C
Eur J Dent; 2020 Mar; 14(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 32311750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.
Ortensi L; Lo Castro E; Rapisarda E; Pedullà E
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the accuracy of dental casts manufactured with 3D printing technique in the All-on-4 treatment concept.
Tas H; Demirci F; Tuzlali M; Bahce E; Yildirim Avcu G
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):379-387. PubMed ID: 36685787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of storage temperature on the dimensional stability of DLP printed casts.
Lee Y; Wang S; Yan P; Zhao Y; Liu Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):331.e1-331.e7. PubMed ID: 37978005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
