These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32312126)

  • 1. Both reaching and grasping are impacted by temporarily induced paresthesia.
    Glazebrook CM; Brown K; Prime SL; Passmore SR; Marotta JJ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2020 Jun; 37(2):106-116. PubMed ID: 32312126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How removing visual information affects grasping movements.
    Bozzacchi C; Brenner E; Smeets JB; Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 236(4):985-995. PubMed ID: 29399704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Going offline: differences in the contributions of movement control processes when reaching in a typical versus novel environment.
    Wijeyaratnam DO; Chua R; Cressman EK
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jun; 237(6):1431-1444. PubMed ID: 30895342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasping occluded targets: investigating the influence of target visibility, allocentric cue presence, and direction of motion on gaze and grasp accuracy.
    Langridge RW; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2705-2716. PubMed ID: 28597294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 234(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 26449965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-line visual control of grasping movements.
    Volcic R; Domini F
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2165-77. PubMed ID: 26996387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reach-to-grasp kinematics and kinetics with and without visual feedback in early-stage Alzheimer's disease.
    Zhang J; Xiao Y; Li ZM; Wei N; Lin L; Li K
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 19(1):121. PubMed ID: 36357939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.
    Magdalon EC; Michaelsen SM; Quevedo AA; Levin MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 21684505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vestibular modulation of visuomotor feedback gains in reaching.
    Oostwoud Wijdenes L; van Beers RJ; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):947-957. PubMed ID: 31314660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual Feedback Processing of the Limb Involves Two Distinct Phases.
    Cross KP; Cluff T; Takei T; Scott SH
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(34):6751-6765. PubMed ID: 31308095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical somatosensory stimulation modulates hand motor function in healthy humans.
    Koesler IB; Dafotakis M; Ameli M; Fink GR; Nowak DA
    J Neurol; 2008 Oct; 255(10):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18769857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.
    Worssam CJ; Meade LC; Connolly JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):385-96. PubMed ID: 25311388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.
    Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 27512020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.
    Flindall JW; Gonzalez CLR
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1945-1952. PubMed ID: 28324136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
    Tang R; Zhu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2215-2224. PubMed ID: 28451736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explicit knowledge about the availability of visual feedback affects grasping with the left but not the right hand.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):293-302. PubMed ID: 24150502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When perception trips action! The increase in the perceived size of both hand and target matters in reaching and grasping movements.
    Ambron E; Schettino LF; Coyle M; Jax S; Coslett HB
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():160-168. PubMed ID: 28957732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.