These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32312590)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
    Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
    Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.
    Martin AN; Berry PS; Friel CM; Hedrick TL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2517-2524. PubMed ID: 29101566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery versus chemoradiation on postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients - A propensity score matched nationwide audit-based study.
    Hoendervangers S; Sparreboom CL; Intven MPW; Lange JF; Verkooijen HM; Doornebosch PG; van Grevenstein WMU;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1605-1612. PubMed ID: 32192792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive versus open intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: long-term oncologic outcomes.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11001. PubMed ID: 34040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
    Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
    Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive surgery for T4 colon cancer is associated with better outcomes compared to open surgery in the National Cancer Database.
    El-Sharkawy F; Gushchin V; Plerhoples TA; Liu C; Emery EL; Collins DT; Bijelic L
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Apr; 47(4):818-827. PubMed ID: 32951935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
    Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
    Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
    J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term restoration of bowel continuity after rectal cancer resection and the influence of surgical technique: A nationwide cross-sectional study.
    Hazen SJA; van Geffen EGM; Sluckin TC; Beets GL; Belgers HJ; Borstlap WAA; Consten ECJ; Dekker JT; Hompes R; Tuynman JB; van Westreenen HL; de Wilt JHW; Tanis PJ; Kusters M;
    Colorectal Dis; 2024 Jun; 26(6):1153-1165. PubMed ID: 38706109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
    Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
    Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.