158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32312966)
1. Mouse tracking reveals structure knowledge in the absence of model-based choice.
Konovalov A; Krajbich I
Nat Commun; 2020 Apr; 11(1):1893. PubMed ID: 32312966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mathematical models of decision making and learning].
Ito M; Doya K
Brain Nerve; 2008 Jul; 60(7):791-8. PubMed ID: 18646619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Entropy-based metrics for predicting choice behavior based on local response to reward.
Trepka E; Spitmaan M; Bari BA; Costa VD; Cohen JY; Soltani A
Nat Commun; 2021 Nov; 12(1):6567. PubMed ID: 34772943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model-based reinforcement learning under concurrent schedules of reinforcement in rodents.
Huh N; Jo S; Kim H; Sul JH; Jung MW
Learn Mem; 2009 May; 16(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 19403794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task.
Suri RE; Schultz W
Neuroscience; 1999; 91(3):871-90. PubMed ID: 10391468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Switching costs in stochastic environments drive the emergence of matching behaviour in animal decision-making through the promotion of reward learning strategies.
Lyu N; Hu Y; Zhang J; Lloyd H; Sun YH; Tao Y
Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23593. PubMed ID: 34880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novelty is not surprise: Human exploratory and adaptive behavior in sequential decision-making.
Xu HA; Modirshanechi A; Lehmann MP; Gerstner W; Herzog MH
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jun; 17(6):e1009070. PubMed ID: 34081705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure learning in human sequential decision-making.
Acuña DE; Schrater P
PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Dec; 6(12):e1001003. PubMed ID: 21151963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning.
Doll BB; Simon DA; Daw ND
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22959354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of learning on perceptual decisions and its implication for speed-accuracy tradeoffs.
Mendonça AG; Drugowitsch J; Vicente MI; DeWitt EEJ; Pouget A; Mainen ZF
Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):2757. PubMed ID: 32488065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reward foraging task and model-based analysis reveal how fruit flies learn value of available options.
Seidenbecher SE; Sanders JI; von Philipsborn AC; Kvitsiani D
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239616. PubMed ID: 33007023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling the learning of biomechanics and visual planning for decision-making of motor actions.
Cos I; Khamassi M; Girard B
J Physiol Paris; 2013 Nov; 107(5):399-408. PubMed ID: 23973913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Heterogeneity of strategy use in the Iowa gambling task: a comparison of win-stay/lose-shift and reinforcement learning models.
Worthy DA; Hawthorne MJ; Otto AR
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 23065763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Major Depression Impairs the Use of Reward Values for Decision-Making.
Rupprechter S; Stankevicius A; Huys QJM; Steele JD; Seriès P
Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13798. PubMed ID: 30218084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Credit Assignment in a Motor Decision Making Task Is Influenced by Agency and Not Sensory Prediction Errors.
Parvin DE; McDougle SD; Taylor JA; Ivry RB
J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(19):4521-4530. PubMed ID: 29650698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tonic or Phasic Stimulation of Dopaminergic Projections to Prefrontal Cortex Causes Mice to Maintain or Deviate from Previously Learned Behavioral Strategies.
Ellwood IT; Patel T; Wadia V; Lee AT; Liptak AT; Bender KJ; Sohal VS
J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(35):8315-8329. PubMed ID: 28739583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational noise in reward-guided learning drives behavioral variability in volatile environments.
Findling C; Skvortsova V; Dromnelle R; Palminteri S; Wyart V
Nat Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 22(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 31659343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amygdala and Ventral Striatum Make Distinct Contributions to Reinforcement Learning.
Costa VD; Dal Monte O; Lucas DR; Murray EA; Averbeck BB
Neuron; 2016 Oct; 92(2):505-517. PubMed ID: 27720488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. (Reinforcement?) Learning to forage optimally.
Kolling N; Akam T
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2017 Oct; 46():162-169. PubMed ID: 28918312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gaze data reveal distinct choice processes underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning.
Konovalov A; Krajbich I
Nat Commun; 2016 Aug; 7():12438. PubMed ID: 27511383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
