173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32315175)
1. Ranking of Ligand Binding Kinetics Using a Weighted Ensemble Approach and Comparison with a Multiscale Milestoning Approach.
Ahn SH; Jagger BR; Amaro RE
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5340-5352. PubMed ID: 32315175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative Ranking of Ligand Binding Kinetics with a Multiscale Milestoning Simulation Approach.
Jagger BR; Lee CT; Amaro RE
J Phys Chem Lett; 2018 Sep; 9(17):4941-4948. PubMed ID: 30070844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SEEKR2: Versatile Multiscale Milestoning Utilizing the OpenMM Molecular Dynamics Engine.
Votapka LW; Stokely AM; Ojha AA; Amaro RE
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(13):3253-3262. PubMed ID: 35759413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SEEKR: Simulation Enabled Estimation of Kinetic Rates, A Computational Tool to Estimate Molecular Kinetics and Its Application to Trypsin-Benzamidine Binding.
Votapka LW; Jagger BR; Heyneman AL; Amaro RE
J Phys Chem B; 2017 Apr; 121(15):3597-3606. PubMed ID: 28191969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting Ligand Binding Kinetics Using a Markovian Milestoning with Voronoi Tessellations Multiscale Approach.
Jagger BR; Ojha AA; Amaro RE
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Aug; 16(8):5348-5357. PubMed ID: 32579371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinetics and free energy of ligand dissociation using weighted ensemble milestoning.
Ray D; Gokey T; Mobley DL; Andricioaei I
J Chem Phys; 2020 Oct; 153(15):154117. PubMed ID: 33092382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transient States and Barriers from Molecular Simulations and the Milestoning Theory: Kinetics in Ligand-Protein Recognition and Compound Design.
Tang Z; Chen SH; Chang CA
J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Mar; 16(3):1882-1895. PubMed ID: 32031801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. QMrebind: incorporating quantum mechanical force field reparameterization at the ligand binding site for improved drug-target kinetics through milestoning simulations.
Ojha AA; Votapka LW; Amaro RE
Chem Sci; 2023 Nov; 14(45):13159-13175. PubMed ID: 38023523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binding Kinetics Toolkit for Analyzing Transient Molecular Conformations and Computing Free Energy Landscapes.
Ruzmetov T; Montes R; Sun J; Chen SH; Tang Z; Chang CA
J Phys Chem A; 2022 Nov; 126(46):8761-8770. PubMed ID: 36346951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Dixon T; Lotz SD; Dickson A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 30141102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Markovian Weighted Ensemble Milestoning (M-WEM): Long-Time Kinetics from Short Trajectories.
Ray D; Stone SE; Andricioaei I
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jan; 18(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 34910499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Free-Energy Calculation and Machine Learning Methods for Understanding Ligand Unbinding Kinetics.
Badaoui M; Buigues PJ; Berta D; Mandana GM; Gu H; Földes T; Dickson CJ; Hornak V; Kato M; Molteni C; Parsons S; Rosta E
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2543-2555. PubMed ID: 35195418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiscale Estimation of Binding Kinetics Using Brownian Dynamics, Molecular Dynamics and Milestoning.
Votapka LW; Amaro RE
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004381. PubMed ID: 26505480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity-ligand unbinding.
Tiwary P; Mondal J; Morrone JA; Berne BJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(39):12015-9. PubMed ID: 26371312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward High-Throughput Predictive Modeling of Protein Binding/Unbinding Kinetics.
Chiu SH; Xie L
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1164-74. PubMed ID: 27159844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Effectively Can Adaptive Sampling Methods Capture Spontaneous Ligand Binding?
Betz RM; Dror RO
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Mar; 15(3):2053-2063. PubMed ID: 30645108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prediction of protein-ligand unbinding for modern drug discovery.
Zhang Q; Zhao N; Meng X; Yu F; Yao X; Liu H
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2022 Feb; 17(2):191-205. PubMed ID: 34731059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ligand Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics 2 (LiGaMD2): Improved Calculations of Ligand Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics with Closed Protein Pocket.
Wang J; Miao Y
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Feb; 19(3):733-745. PubMed ID: 36706316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding and Unbinding Kinetics with Biased MD Simulations and Coarse-Graining of Dynamics: Current State and Challenges.
Wolf S
J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2902-2910. PubMed ID: 37133392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating Drug-Target Residence Time in Kinases through Enhanced Sampling Simulations.
Gobbo D; Piretti V; Di Martino RMC; Tripathi SK; Giabbai B; Storici P; Demitri N; Girotto S; Decherchi S; Cavalli A
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Aug; 15(8):4646-4659. PubMed ID: 31246463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
