325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32315265)
1. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.
Westphalen AC; McCulloch CE; Anaokar JM; Arora S; Barashi NS; Barentsz JO; Bathala TK; Bittencourt LK; Booker MT; Braxton VG; Carroll PR; Casalino DD; Chang SD; Coakley FV; Dhatt R; Eberhardt SC; Foster BR; Froemming AT; Fütterer JJ; Ganeshan DM; Gertner MR; Mankowski Gettle L; Ghai S; Gupta RT; Hahn ME; Houshyar R; Kim C; Kim CK; Lall C; Margolis DJA; McRae SE; Oto A; Parsons RB; Patel NU; Pinto PA; Polascik TJ; Spilseth B; Starcevich JB; Tammisetti VS; Taneja SS; Turkbey B; Verma S; Ward JF; Warlick CA; Weinberger AR; Yu J; Zagoria RJ; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 32315265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment.
Schelb P; Kohl S; Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kickingereder P; Bickelhaupt S; Kuder TA; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Maier-Hein KH; Bonekamp D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):607-617. PubMed ID: 31592731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of PI-RADS 4 lesions within the prostatic peripheral zone: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating 170 lesions.
Shankar PR; Curci NE; Davenport MS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Aug; 43(8):2176-2182. PubMed ID: 29198006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of PI-RADS classification in MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
NiMhurchu E; O'Kelly F; Murphy IG; Lavelle LP; Collins CD; Lennon G; Galvin D; Mulvin D; Quinlan D; McMahon CJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 26880299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of
Margel D; Bernstine H; Groshar D; Ber Y; Nezrit O; Segal N; Yakimov M; Baniel J; Domachevsky L
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.
Park SY; Jung DC; Oh YT; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Han K
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 26836049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Prostate MRI Interpretation Experience on PPV Using PI-RADS Version 2: A 6-Year Assessment Among Eight Fellowship-Trained Radiologists.
Salka BR; Shankar PR; Troost JP; Khalatbari S; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):453-460. PubMed ID: 35319914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Tan N; Lin WC; Khoshnoodi P; Asvadi NH; Yoshida J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Wu H; Sung KH; Lu DY; Huang J; Raman SS
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 27861110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
Martorana E; Pirola GM; Scialpi M; Micali S; Iseppi A; Bonetti LR; Kaleci S; Torricelli P; Bianchi G
BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 27608292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
