These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32315902)

  • 21. Revisiting the nexus between digital trade, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in BRICS economies.
    Yuerong H; Javaid MQ; Ali MSE; Zada M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(6):8585-8607. PubMed ID: 38180664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental benefit of clean energy consumption: can BRICS economies achieve environmental sustainability through human capital?
    Liu Y; Sohail MT; Khan A; Majeed MT
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):6766-6776. PubMed ID: 34460087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to achieve carbon neutrality while maintaining economic vitality: An exploration from the perspective of technological innovation and trade openness.
    Jiang R; Liu B
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Apr; 868():161490. PubMed ID: 36634768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Renewable energy, forest cover, export diversification, and ecological footprint: a machine learning application in moderating eco-innovations on agriculture in the BRICS-T economies.
    Padhan H; Ghosh S; Hammoudeh S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(35):83771-83791. PubMed ID: 37353698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Financial efficiency and CO
    Mngumi F; Huang L; Xiuli G; Ayub B
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24321. PubMed ID: 38304825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries.
    Aydin M; Turan YE
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):43233-43245. PubMed ID: 32734540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience.
    Balsalobre-Lorente D; Driha OM; Bekun FV; Osundina OA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25218-25234. PubMed ID: 31256399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Towards Achieving Sustainable Development: Role of Technology Innovation, Technology Adoption and CO
    Su CW; Xie Y; Shahab S; Faisal CMN; Hafeez M; Qamri GM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33401479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Energy mix outlook and the EKC hypothesis in BRICS countries: a perspective of economic freedom vs. economic growth.
    Akadırı SS; Alola AA; Usman O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(7):8922-8926. PubMed ID: 33410045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is skewed income distribution good for environmental quality? A comparative analysis among selected BRICS countries.
    Mahalik MK; Mallick H; Padhan H; Sahoo B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(23):23170-23194. PubMed ID: 29862476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The greenhouse effect of the agriculture-economic growth-renewable energy nexus: Evidence from G20 countries.
    Qiao H; Zheng F; Jiang H; Dong K
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 671():722-731. PubMed ID: 30939325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Economic growth, technology, and CO
    Peng G; Meng F; Ahmed Z; Ahmad M; Kurbonov K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):68051-68062. PubMed ID: 35526204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO
    Zafar MW; Mirza FM; Zaidi SAH; Hou F
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(15):15162-15173. PubMed ID: 30927221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does energy efficiency improve environmental quality in BRICS countries? Empirical evidence using dynamic panels with heterogeneous slopes.
    Dahir AM; Mahi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(8):12027-12042. PubMed ID: 34561806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Caring for the environment: how CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies?
    Li X; Ullah S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(12):18036-18046. PubMed ID: 34677778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accounting for the combined impacts of natural resources rent, income level, and energy consumption on environmental quality of G7 economies: a panel quantile regression approach.
    Gyamfi BA; Onifade ST; Nwani C; Bekun FV
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):2806-2818. PubMed ID: 34378136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How CO
    Chen L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(1):457-467. PubMed ID: 34333752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: evidence from the newly industrializing countries.
    Ahmed K; Shahbaz M; Kyophilavong P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(8):7676-91. PubMed ID: 26743648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies.
    Zuo S; Zhu M; Xu Z; Oláh J; Lakner Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of stock market, renewable energy consumption and urbanization on environmental degradation: new evidence from BRICS countries.
    Younis I; Naz A; Shah SAA; Nadeem M; Longsheng C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Jun; 28(24):31549-31565. PubMed ID: 33608780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.