These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32316708)

  • 1. Using the Angoff method to set a standard on mock exams for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Yim MK; Shin S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():14. PubMed ID: 32316708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee.
    Park J; Ahn DS; Yim MK; Lee J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():32. PubMed ID: 30586956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of results between modified-Angoff and bookmark methods for estimating cut score of the Korean medical licensing examination.
    Yim M
    Korean J Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 30(4):347-357. PubMed ID: 30522263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study.
    Kim DH; Kang YJ; Park HK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():33. PubMed ID: 36503200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Possibility of using the yes/no Angoff method as a substitute for the percent Angoff method for estimating the cutoff score of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination: a simulation study.
    Park J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():23. PubMed ID: 36045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity of the cut score in test sets with different item amounts using the modified Angoff, modified Ebel, and Hofstee standard-setting methods for the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Park J; Yim MK; Kim NJ; Ahn DS; Kim YM
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():28. PubMed ID: 33010798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relevance of the test content of the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination to nursing job.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Ahn SY; Kang SY; Kim KS
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():23. PubMed ID: 27270986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item development process and analysis of 50 case-based items for implementation on the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.
    Park IS; Suh YO; Park HS; Kang SY; Kim KS; Kim GH; Choi YH; Kim HJ
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():20. PubMed ID: 28900070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests.
    Yousefi Afrashteh M
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jan; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception survey on the introduction of clinical performance examination as part of the national nursing licensing examination in Korea.
    Shin SJ; Kim YK; Suh SR; Jung DY; Kim Y; Yim MK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():26. PubMed ID: 29129904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method.
    Jalili M; Hejri SM; Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of the DETECT program for assessing the internal structure of dimensionality in simulated data and results of the Korean nursing licensing examination.
    Seo DG; Choi Y; Huh S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():32. PubMed ID: 29278904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation-based examinations in physician assistant education: A comparison of two standard-setting methods.
    Carlson J; Tomkowiak J; Knott P
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2010; 21(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 21141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
    Dwyer T; Wright S; Kulasegaram KM; Theodoropoulos J; Chahal J; Wasserstein D; Ringsted C; Hodges B; Ogilvie-Harris D
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():1. PubMed ID: 26727954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angoff Method of Setting Cut Scores for High-Stakes Testing: Foley Catheter Checkoff as an Exemplar.
    Kardong-Edgren S; Mulcock PM
    Nurse Educ; 2016; 41(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 26402909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standard setting of objective structured practical examination by modified Angoff method: A pilot study.
    Kamath MG; Pallath V; Ramnarayan K; Kamath A; Torke S; Gonsalves J
    Natl Med J India; 2016; 29(3):160-162. PubMed ID: 27808068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of different standard-setting methods for professional qualifying dental examination.
    Abd-Rahman ANA; Baharuddin IH; Abu-Hassan MI; Davies SJ
    J Dent Educ; 2021 Jul; 85(7):1210-1216. PubMed ID: 33792052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing veterinary students' performance with cut-scores determined using a modified individual Angoff method featuring Bloom's taxonomy.
    Leask R; Cronje T; Holm DE; van Ryneveld L
    Vet Rec; 2020 Dec; 187(12):e121. PubMed ID: 33055287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.