53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3231797)
1. [A study of cemented and non-cemented total hip prostheses. 4-year follow-up].
Wykman A; Goldie I
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1988; 74 Suppl 2():276-7. PubMed ID: 3231797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Universal total hip replacement with focus on the acetabular component and the hybrid hip.
McKenzie JM; Nelson CL; Goodman WW
Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 10149557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip replacement. A comparison between cemented (Charnley) and non-cemented (HP Garches) fixation by clinical assessment and objective gait analysis.
Olsson E; Goldie I; Wykman A
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1986; 18(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 3787206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].
Eingartner C; Ihm A; Maurer F; Volkmann R; Weise K; Weller S
Unfallchirurg; 2002 Sep; 105(9):804-10. PubMed ID: 12232740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The madreporic cementless total hip arthroplasty. New experimental data and a seven-year clinical follow-up study.
Lord G; Bancel P
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Jun; (176):67-76. PubMed ID: 6851343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Choice of hip prosthesis in patients younger than 50 years].
Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Veth RP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Sep; 151(35):1918-22. PubMed ID: 17907541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical results of cemented revision of primary cemented total hip arthroplasties.
Diekerhof CH; Barnaart LF; Rozing PM
Acta Orthop Belg; 2000 Oct; 66(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 11103490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 22-mm vs the 32-mm femoral head in cemented primary hip arthroplasty long-term clinical and radiological follow-up study.
Shaju KA; Hasan ST; D'Souza LG; McMahon B; Masterson EL
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 16230243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cemented hip alloplasty. 11-13-year follow-up study of the Richards' series 2 hip prostheses].
Laursen JO; Wedderkopp N; Pedersen BK; Mossing NB
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Sep; 156(38):5505-9. PubMed ID: 7941084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Loosening of cemented total hip prostheses. 31 cases].
Ameziane L; Berrada MS; Bensouda B; Kabbaj N; el Yaacoubi M; el Manouar M
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(5):480. PubMed ID: 9752494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study.
Russotti GM; Coventry MB; Stauffer RN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):141-7. PubMed ID: 3416521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of direct contact between the femoral stem and the diaphyseal bone in total cemented prostheses].
Vives P; de Lestang M; Jarde O; Decoopman M
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1987; 73 Suppl 2():218-20. PubMed ID: 3432679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The rationale for cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Evans BG; Salvati EA; Huo MH; Huk OL
Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):599-610. PubMed ID: 8414425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Middle-term evaluation of 155 hip arthroplasties using cemented double cups].
Lang G; Kehr P; Trensz T; Steib JP; Paternotte H
Chirurgie; 1983; 109(6):486-93. PubMed ID: 6661970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of cemented total hip replacements.
Ritter MA; Keating EM; Faris PM
Semin Arthroplasty; 1990 Jul; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 10149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mittelmeier's ceramic hip prosthesis.
Rampoldi A
Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1984 Sep; 10(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 6519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Current knowledge and future perspectives of cementless endoprosthetics].
Hungerford DS; Krackow KA; Lennox DW
Orthopade; 1987 Jun; 16(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 3627794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Hartofilakidis G; Georgiades G; Babis GC
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Feb; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18534419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
