These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32318868)
21. Novel technique using cold atmospheric plasma coupled with air-polishing for the treatment of titanium discs grown with biofilm: An in-vitro study. Hui WL; Ipe D; Perrotti V; Piattelli A; Fang Z; Ostrikov K; Quaranta A Dent Mater; 2021 Feb; 37(2):359-369. PubMed ID: 33358017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis]. Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Microstructural Evaluation of Contaminated Implant Surface Treated by Laser, Photodynamic Therapy, and Chlorhexidine 2 percent. Saffarpour A; Nozari A; Fekrazad R; Saffarpour A; Heibati MN; Iranparvar K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1019-1026. PubMed ID: 30231087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Microbiological and Imaging-Based Evaluations of Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Er:YAG Laser Therapy in the In Vitro Decontamination of Titanium and Zirconia Surfaces. Munteanu IR; Luca RE; Hogea E; Erdelyi RA; Duma VF; Marsavina L; Globasu AL; Constantin GD; Todea DC Microorganisms; 2024 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 39065113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term inflammatory outcome after placement of a novel two-piece dental implant in a dog model experimental peri-implantitis. Liat C; Haim T Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Sep; 28(10):519. PubMed ID: 39249609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of a novel three-step decontamination protocol for titanium-based dental implants: An in vitro and in vivo study. Costa RC; Takeda TTS; Dini C; Bertolini M; Ferreira RC; Pereira G; Sacramento CM; Ruiz KGS; Feres M; Shibli JA; Barāo VAR; Souza JGS Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):268-281. PubMed ID: 38131526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. In Vitro Comparison of Titanium Disc Surface Roughness and Bacterial Colonization After Ultrasonic Instrumentation With Three Different Tips. Kitaygorodskiy A; Gregory RL; Lim G; Hamada Y J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 39023858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biologic width adjacent to loaded implants with machined and rough collars in the dog. Cochran DL; Obrecht M; Weber K; Dard M; Bosshardt D; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Jones AA Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2014; 34(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 25411732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Decontamination Effect of an Oscillating Chitosan Brush Compared With an Ultrasonic PEEK-Tip: An In Vitro Study Using a Dynamic Biofilm Model. Khan SN; Ribeiro-Vidal H; Virto L; Bravo E; Nuevo P; Koldsland OC; Hjortsjö C; Sanz M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39425255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Review of Bacterial Colonization on Dental Implants With Various Hygiene Instruments. Chen A; Ghaffar H; Taib H; Hassan A Cureus; 2023 Oct; 15(10):e47483. PubMed ID: 38021779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review. Saulacic N; Schaller B J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2019; 10(1):e1. PubMed ID: 31069039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Louropoulou A; Slot DE; Van der Weijden F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Oct; 25(10):1149-60. PubMed ID: 23834327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness. Matsubara VH; Leong BW; Leong MJL; Lawrence Z; Becker T; Quaranta A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31837107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. Chairay JP; Boulekbache H; Jean A; Soyer A; Bouchard P J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1215-22. PubMed ID: 9444598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biofilm formation on dental implants with a hybrid surface microtopography: An in vitro study in a validated multispecies dynamic biofilm model. Bravo E; Serrano B; Ribeiro-Vidal H; Virto L; Sánchez IS; Herrera D; Sanz M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):475-485. PubMed ID: 36847713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Antimicrobial Agents Used in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Alter the Physicochemistry and Cytocompatibility of Titanium Surfaces. Kotsakis GA; Lan C; Barbosa J; Lill K; Chen R; Rudney J; Aparicio C J Periodontol; 2016 Jul; 87(7):809-19. PubMed ID: 26923474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Prevention of Implant Surface Alterations in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Comparison of Three Different Mechanical and Physical Treatments. Lollobrigida M; Fortunato L; Serafini G; Mazzucchi G; Bozzuto G; Molinari A; Serra E; Menchini F; Vozza I; De Biase A Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32290450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]