297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32318957)
1. Discrepancy between FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the staging of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: implications for treatment planning.
Jacene HA; DiPiro PJ; Bellon J; Hu J; Cheng SC; Warren L; Schlosnagle E; Nakhlis F; Rosenbluth JM; Yeh E; Overmoyer B
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 32318957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [18F]FDG PET/CT in the staging of inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review.
van Uden DJP; Prins MW; Siesling S; de Wilt JHW; Blanken-Peeters CFJM; Aarntzen EHJG
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2020 Jul; 151():102943. PubMed ID: 32416347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of
Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J; Jung JH; Park HY; Jeong SY; Lee SW; Chae YS
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1106. PubMed ID: 33198673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer.
Champion L; Lerebours F; Cherel P; Edeline V; Giraudet AL; Wartski M; Bellet D; Alberini JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Aug; 40(8):1206-13. PubMed ID: 23640467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Hogan MP; Goldman DA; Dashevsky B; Riedl CC; Gönen M; Osborne JR; Jochelson M; Hudis C; Morrow M; Ulaner GA
J Nucl Med; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1674-80. PubMed ID: 26294295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Shigekawa T; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Yamamoto M; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 38(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 18407934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretreatment staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with inflammatory breast cancer influences radiation treatment field designs.
Walker GV; Niikura N; Yang W; Rohren E; Valero V; Woodward WA; Alvarez RH; Lucci A; Ueno NT; Buchholz TA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1381-6. PubMed ID: 22284689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between the standardized uptake value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and the prognostic factors of invasive lobular carcinoma: in comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jung NY; Kim SH; Choi BB; Kim SH; Sung MS
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 13():113. PubMed ID: 25889560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.
Chang HT; Hu C; Chiu YL; Peng NJ; Liu RS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115127. PubMed ID: 25517451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and radiotherapy planning in patients with anal cancer.
Bannas P; Weber C; Adam G; Frenzel T; Derlin T; Mester J; Klutmann S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):445-51. PubMed ID: 20832181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Ulaner GA; Castillo R; Wills J; Gönen M; Goldman DA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1420-1427. PubMed ID: 28456837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of PET-FDG in primary breast cancer based on histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors.
Heudel P; Cimarelli S; Montella A; Bouteille C; Mognetti T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2010 Dec; 15(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 20809217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial staging impact of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in locally advanced breast cancer.
Niikura N; Liu J; Costelloe CM; Palla SL; Madewell JE; Hayashi N; Yu TK; Tokuda Y; Theriault RL; Hortobagyi GN; Ueno NT
Oncologist; 2011; 16(6):772-82. PubMed ID: 21632453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of breast cancer subtypes, based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, with functional imaging parameters from ⁶⁸Ga-RGD PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT.
Yoon HJ; Kang KW; Chun IK; Cho N; Im SA; Jeong S; Lee S; Jung KC; Lee YS; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Chung JK; Moon WK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Aug; 41(8):1534-43. PubMed ID: 24652232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic impact of (18)FDG-PET-CT findings in clinical stage III and IIB breast cancer.
Groheux D; Hindié E; Delord M; Giacchetti S; Hamy AS; de Bazelaire C; de Roquancourt A; Vercellino L; Toubert ME; Merlet P; Espié M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Dec; 104(24):1879-87. PubMed ID: 23243198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of FDG-PET/CT at the postoperative surveillance in the breast cancer patients.
Jung NY; Yoo IR; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Chae BJ; Seo YY
Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 24872087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in inflammatory breast cancer.
Baslaim MM; Bakheet SM; Bakheet R; Ezzat A; El-Foudeh M; Tulbah A
World J Surg; 2003 Oct; 27(10):1099-104. PubMed ID: 12917770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of CE-FDG-PET/CT with CE-FDG-PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases in breast cancer patients.
Catalano OA; Nicolai E; Rosen BR; Luongo A; Catalano M; Iannace C; Guimaraes A; Vangel MG; Mahmood U; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Br J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 112(9):1452-60. PubMed ID: 25871331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
