160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3231947)
1. Stopping rules and estimation problems in clinical trials.
Hughes MD; Pocock SJ
Stat Med; 1988 Dec; 7(12):1231-42. PubMed ID: 3231947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the "freezing effect" on subsequent research.
Wang H; Rosner GL; Goodman SN
Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):621-631. PubMed ID: 27271682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Practical problems in interim analyses, with particular regard to estimation.
Pocock SJ; Hughes MD
Control Clin Trials; 1989 Dec; 10(4 Suppl):209S-221S. PubMed ID: 2605969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation issues in clinical trials and overviews.
Pocock SJ; Hughes MD
Stat Med; 1990 Jun; 9(6):657-71. PubMed ID: 2145623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility.
Walter SD; Han H; Briel M; Guyatt GH
Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28183155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of stopping rules on heterogeneity of results in overviews of clinical trials.
Hughes MD; Freedman LS; Pocock SJ
Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1581492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian predictive approach to interim monitoring in clinical trials.
Dmitrienko A; Wang MD
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(13):2178-95. PubMed ID: 16007570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.
Karrison TG; Huo D; Chappell R
Control Clin Trials; 2003 Oct; 24(5):506-22. PubMed ID: 14500050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical rules for safety monitoring in clinical trials.
Martens MJ; Logan BR
Clin Trials; 2024 Apr; 21(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 37877375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect.
Walter SD; Guyatt GH; Bassler D; Briel M; Ramsay T; Han HD
Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2524-2543. PubMed ID: 30887553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential bias.
Schou IM; Marschner IC
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4859-74. PubMed ID: 23824994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data.
Sambucini V
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A pragmatic, adaptive clinical trial design for a rare disease: The FOcal Cerebral Arteriopathy Steroid (FOCAS) trial.
Park Y; Fullerton HJ; Elm JJ
Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Nov; 86():105852. PubMed ID: 31614215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials.
Thall P; Fox P; Wathen J
Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1621-8. PubMed ID: 25979922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stopping clinical trials early for benefit: impact on estimation.
Freidlin B; Korn EL
Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19342463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Issues in designing sequential stopping rules for monitoring side effects in clinical trials.
Goldman AI
Control Clin Trials; 1987 Dec; 8(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 3327653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A note regarding meta-analysis of sequential trials with stopping for efficacy.
Senn S
Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 25296692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization.
Du Y; Wang X; Jack Lee J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jan; 40():15-25. PubMed ID: 25460340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
