BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32320800)

  • 21. ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.
    Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Lopez Blanco A; Humberto Fregnani J; Lopes A; Perrotta M; Tsunoda AT; Cantú-de-León DF; Ramondetta LM; Manchana T; Crotzer DR; McNally OM; Riege M; Scambia G; Carvajal JM; Di Guilmi J; Rendon GJ; Ramalingam P; Fellman BM; Coleman RL; Frumovitz M; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 34493587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adenosquamous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in early-stage cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy: an outcomes analysis.
    dos Reis R; Frumovitz M; Milam MR; Capp E; Sun CC; Coleman RL; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 17854872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?
    Plante M; Renaud MC; Sebastianelli A; Gregoire J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):981-986. PubMed ID: 32499393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.
    Spirtos NM; Eisenkop SM; Schlaerth JB; Ballon SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 12193922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Kuznicki ML; Chambers LM; Morton M; Son J; Horowitz M; Crean-Tate KK; Hackett L; Rose PG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):513-526.e1. PubMed ID: 33223017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
    Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
    Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Iuzzolino D; Rasile M; Tinelli A
    Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 18805001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictive factors of severe perioperative morbidity of radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A French prospective multicentric cohort of 248 patients.
    Balaya V; Mathevet P; Magaud L; Delomenie M; Bonsang-Kitzis H; Ngô C; Huchon C; Bats AS; Lecuru F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):650-658. PubMed ID: 30910053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.