These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32321373)

  • 1. Victims, Vignettes, and Videos: Meta-Analytic and Experimental Evidence That Emotional Impact Enhances the Derogation of Innocent Victims.
    Dawtry RJ; Callan MJ; Harvey AJ; Gheorghiu AI
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2020 Aug; 24(3):233-259. PubMed ID: 32321373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Derogating Innocent Victims: The Effects of Relative Versus Absolute Character Judgments.
    Dawtry RJ; Callan MJ; Harvey AJ; Olson JM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):186-199. PubMed ID: 28972444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of the self and most people's reactions towards innocent and noninnocent victims.
    Alves H; Correia I
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E69. PubMed ID: 24230932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More Than a Feeling: Public Expectations About Emotional Responses to Criminal Victimization.
    Wrede O; Ask K
    Violence Vict; 2015; 30(5):902-15. PubMed ID: 26300290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. We blame innocent victims more than I do: self-construal level moderates responses to just-world threats.
    van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1528-39. PubMed ID: 19713566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental evidence of subtle victim blame in the absence of explicit blame.
    Hafer CL; Rubel AN; Drolet CE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227229. PubMed ID: 31887196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The emotional male victim: effects of presentation mode on judged credibility.
    Landström S; Ask K; Sommar C
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 56(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25356749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional disclosure and victim blaming.
    Harber KD; Podolski P; Williams CH
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 25799160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can norm theory explain the effects of victim age and level of physical maturity on perceptions of child sexual abuse?
    Rogers P; Davies M; Anderson I; Potton A
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Jul; 26(10):1911-33. PubMed ID: 20587466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task.
    Hafer CL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Aug; 79(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10948971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification.
    Kay AC; Jost JT; Young S
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 15733206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why emotions matter: expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect.
    Ask K; Landström S
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 20107882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Derogating victims and dehumanizing perpetrators: functions of two types of beliefs in a just world].
    Murayama A; Miura A
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2015 Apr; 86(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 26012259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims.
    Rose MR; Nadler J; Clark J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):203-19. PubMed ID: 16786407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blaming the victim: the effects of extraversion and information disclosure on guilt attributions in cyberbullying.
    Weber M; Ziegele M; Schnauber A
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Apr; 16(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 23441684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Traditionalism and victim blaming.
    Felson RB; Palmore CC
    J Soc Psychol; 2021 Jul; 161(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 33706672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
    McGowan MG; Myers B
    Violence Vict; 2004 Jun; 19(3):357-74. PubMed ID: 15631286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rape Myth Consistency and Gender Differences in Perceiving Rape Victims: A Meta-Analysis.
    Hockett JM; Smith SJ; Klausing CD; Saucier DA
    Violence Against Women; 2016 Feb; 22(2):139-67. PubMed ID: 26446194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workplace mobbing: How the victim's coping behavior influences bystander responses.
    Mulder R; Bos AE; Pouwelse M; van Dam K
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 26886252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In search of the silver lining: the justice motive fosters perceptions of benefits in the later lives of tragedy victims.
    Anderson JE; Kay AC; Fitzsimons GM
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1599-604. PubMed ID: 20959512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.