These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32322181)
1. The Effectiveness of Advance Letters for Cell Telephone Samples. Skalland B; Zhao Z; Jeyarajah J Proc Am Stat Assoc; 2014 May; 20(May 15-18 2014):. PubMed ID: 32322181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in Efficiencies Between ABS and RDD Samples by Mode of Data Collection. Pierannunzi C; Gamble S; Locke R; Freedner N; Town M Surv Pract; 2019 Aug; 12(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 33850669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013. Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation tools for reducing the impact of sampling and nonresponse errors in dual-frame RDD telephone surveys. Wolter KM; Ganesh N; Copeland KR; Singleton JA; Khare M Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4718-4732. PubMed ID: 31418889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. Barr ML; van Ritten JJ; Steel DG; Thackway SV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():177. PubMed ID: 23173849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study. Gundersen DA; Wivagg J; Young WJ; Yan T; Delnevo CD J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e31545. PubMed ID: 34932017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing a weighting strategy to include mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey using an overlapping dual-frame design with limited benchmark information. Barr ML; Ferguson RA; Hughes PJ; Steel DG BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Sep; 14():102. PubMed ID: 25189826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys. Lee S; Brick JM; Brown ER; Grant D Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):1121-39. PubMed ID: 20500221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of address-based sampling and random-digit dialing methods for recruiting young men as controls in a case-control study of testicular cancer susceptibility. Clagett B; Nathanson KL; Ciosek SL; McDermoth M; Vaughn DJ; Mitra N; Weiss A; Martonik R; Kanetsky PA Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 178(11):1638-47. PubMed ID: 24008901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Moving towards a single-frame cell phone design in random digit dialing surveys: considerations from a French general population health survey. Soullier N; Legleye S; Richard JB BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):94. PubMed ID: 35369861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving public health surveillance using a dual-frame survey of landline and cell phone numbers. Hu SS; Balluz L; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 173(6):703-11. PubMed ID: 21343246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. Voigt LF; Schwartz SM; Doody DR; Lee SC; Li CI Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 173(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 21071602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random digit dialling and Electronic White Pages samples compared: demographic profiles and health estimates. Wilson DH; Starr GJ; Taylor AW; Dal Grande E Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Dec; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 10641355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples. Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Telephone household screening and interviewing. Harlow BL; Hartge P Am J Epidemiol; 1983 May; 117(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 6846319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Address-based versus random-digit-dial surveys: comparison of key health and risk indicators. Link MW; Battaglia MP; Frankel MR; Osborn L; Mokdad AH Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 164(10):1019-25. PubMed ID: 16968861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving gambling survey research using dual-frame sampling of landline and mobile phone numbers. Jackson AC; Pennay D; Dowling NA; Coles-Janess B; Christensen DR J Gambl Stud; 2014 Jun; 30(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 23288431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing Call Patterns for Landline and Cell Phone Surveys. Reimer B; Roth V; Montgomery R Proc Am Stat Assoc; 2012; 2012():4648-4660. PubMed ID: 29606918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inclusion of mobile telephone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia, using an overlapping dual-frame design: impact on the time series. Barr ML; Ferguson RA; Steel DG BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug; 7():517. PubMed ID: 25113743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. Dal Grande E; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]