These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32322609)

  • 1. Nonlinear voxel-based finite element model for strength assessment of healthy and metastatic proximal femurs.
    Sas A; Ohs N; Tanck E; van Lenthe GH
    Bone Rep; 2020 Jun; 12():100263. PubMed ID: 32322609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation.
    Chai X; van Herk M; Hulshof MC; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 22225275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of deep learning-based lesion segmentation on failure load calculations of metastatic femurs using finite element analysis.
    Ataei A; Eggermont F; Verdonschot N; Lessmann N; Tanck E
    Bone; 2024 Feb; 179():116987. PubMed ID: 38061504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulated lesions representative of metastatic disease predict proximal femur failure strength more accurately than idealized lesions.
    Johnson JE; Brouillette MJ; Permeswaran PT; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
    J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 106():109825. PubMed ID: 32517984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervised learning for bone shape and cortical thickness estimation from CT images for finite element analysis.
    Chandran V; Maquer G; Gerig T; Zysset P; Reyes M
    Med Image Anal; 2019 Feb; 52():42-55. PubMed ID: 30471462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting the stiffness and strength of human femurs with real metastatic tumors.
    Yosibash Z; Plitman Mayo R; Dahan G; Trabelsi N; Amir G; Milgrom C
    Bone; 2014 Dec; 69():180-90. PubMed ID: 25284156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental validation of a voxel-based finite element model simulating femoroplasty of lytic lesions in the proximal femur.
    Sas A; Sermon A; van Lenthe GH
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7602. PubMed ID: 35534595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining agreement between finite element modelling methodologies in predicting pathological fracture risk in proximal femurs with bone metastases.
    O'Rourke D; Johnson LJ; Jagiello J; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Apr; 104():105931. PubMed ID: 36906986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur.
    Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z; Milgrom C
    J Biomech; 2009 Feb; 42(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 19118831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
    Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur.
    Grassi L; Hraiech N; Schileo E; Ansaloni M; Rochette M; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21036655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trabecular plates and rods determine elastic modulus and yield strength of human trabecular bone.
    Wang J; Zhou B; Liu XS; Fields AJ; Sanyal A; Shi X; Adams M; Keaveny TM; Guo XE
    Bone; 2015 Mar; 72():71-80. PubMed ID: 25460571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.
    Zeinali A; Hashemi B; Akhlaghpoor S
    Phys Med; 2010 Apr; 26(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 19781969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.
    Derikx LC; van Aken JB; Janssen D; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 22844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations.
    Johnson JE; Brouillette MJ; Miller BJ; Goetz JE
    Biomed Eng Comput Biol; 2023; 14():11795972231166240. PubMed ID: 37020922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Building an effective nonlinear three-dimensional finite-element model of human thoracolumbar spine].
    Zeng ZL; Cheng LM; Zhu R; Wang JJ; Yu Y
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(31):2176-80. PubMed ID: 22094033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.