These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32324050)

  • 1. Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research.
    Were E; Kaguiri E; Kiplagat J
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):372-389. PubMed ID: 32324050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
    Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey.
    Pryor ER; Habermann B; Broome ME
    J Med Ethics; 2007 Jun; 33(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 17526690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
    Marusic A; Wager E; Utrobicic A; Rothstein HR; Sambunjak D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):MR000038. PubMed ID: 27040721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
    Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
    Bosch X; Hernández C; Pericas JM; Doti P; Marušić A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51928. PubMed ID: 23284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific Misconduct.
    Fitzpatrick JJ
    Appl Nurs Res; 2018 Jun; 41():87. PubMed ID: 29853221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
    Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomedical paper retractions have quadrupled in 20 years - why?
    Else H
    Nature; 2024 Jun; 630(8016):280-281. PubMed ID: 38822109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.
    Artino AR; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 30113363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.
    Adesanya AA
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2020; 27(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 32687128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior.
    Holm S; Hofmann B
    Account Res; 2018; 25(5):290-300. PubMed ID: 29874932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
    Keranen L
    Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.