BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32324059)

  • 1. A Comparison of Regularized Maximum-Likelihood, Regularized 2-Stage Least Squares, and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation with Misspecified Models, Small Samples, and Weak Factor Structure.
    Finch WH; Miller JE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):608-626. PubMed ID: 32324059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage ridge least-squares estimation.
    Jung S
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 22528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-Stage maximum likelihood estimation in the misspecified restricted latent class model.
    Wang S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):300-333. PubMed ID: 29080215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.
    Shi D; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):421-445. PubMed ID: 32425213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis.
    Nestler S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):127-43. PubMed ID: 22524532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum likelihood estimation in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
    Oort FJ; Jak S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 27286901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):731-755. PubMed ID: 30477318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.
    Du H; Bentler PM
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):519-540. PubMed ID: 34166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model.
    Nestler S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):870-889. PubMed ID: 33094388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Penalized Least Squares for Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Responses.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):279-297. PubMed ID: 32990059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
    Ximénez C
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pairwise Likelihood Ratio Tests and Model Selection Criteria for Structural Equation Models with Ordinal Variables.
    Katsikatsou M; Moustaki I
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1046-1068. PubMed ID: 27734296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
    Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression.
    Ye A; Gates KM; Henry TR; Luo L
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):404-441. PubMed ID: 33840003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural Equation Modeling of Social Networks: Specification, Estimation, and Application.
    Liu H; Jin IH; Zhang Z
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(5):714-730. PubMed ID: 30477339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes.
    Jung S; Seo DG; Park J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():507. PubMed ID: 32372995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables.
    Lee SY; Poon WY; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1995 Nov; 48 ( Pt 2)():339-58. PubMed ID: 8527346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.
    Xia Y; Yang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):409-428. PubMed ID: 29869222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study on the Performance of GSCA and CSA in Parameter Recovery for Structural Equation Models With Ordinal Observed Variables.
    Jung K; Panko P; Lee J; Hwang H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2461. PubMed ID: 30568625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of covariance misspecification in multivariate Gaussian mixtures on estimation and inference: an application to longitudinal modeling.
    Heggeseth BC; Jewell NP
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2790-803. PubMed ID: 23296542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.