These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32324823)

  • 1. Perceived losses of scientific integrity under the Trump administration: A survey of federal scientists.
    Goldman GT; Carter JM; Wang Y; Larson JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231929. PubMed ID: 32324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An equity and environmental justice assessment of anti-science actions during the Trump administration.
    Desikan A; MacKinney T; Kalman C; Carter JM; Reed G; Goldman GT
    J Public Health Policy; 2023 Mar; 44(1):147-162. PubMed ID: 36737622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.
    Carroll C; Hartl B; Goldman GT; Rohlf DJ; Treves A; Kerr JT; Ritchie EG; Kingsford RT; Gibbs KE; Maron M; Watson JEM
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):967-975. PubMed ID: 28741747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Politics v. science: How President Trump's war on science impacted public health and environmental regulation.
    Webb RM; Kurtz L
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2022; 188(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 35168747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies.
    Myers TA; Kotcher J; Stenhouse N; Anderson AA; Maibach E; Beall L; Leiserowitz A
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Oct; 26(7):843-860. PubMed ID: 26960910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Awareness and trust of the FDA and CDC: Results from a national sample of US adults and adolescents.
    Kowitt SD; Schmidt AM; Hannan A; Goldstein AO
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177546. PubMed ID: 28520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shattering the Mirage: The FDA's Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response Demonstrates a Need for Reform to Restore Agency Credibility.
    Fuleihan C
    Am J Law Med; 2022 Dec; 48(4):307-342. PubMed ID: 37039751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eroding trust and collaboration.
    Thorp HH
    Science; 2023 Mar; 379(6638):1171. PubMed ID: 36952399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of political interference / EPA air pollution decision threatens public health: science disregarded, misrepresented on particulate matter standard.
    Union of Concerned Scientists
    New Solut; 2007; 17(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 17434854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coordinating activities between NOAA and other agencies.
    Fritz AT; Buchman MF
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1997 Nov; 20(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9433660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Obama's science legacy: uneven progress on scientific integrity.
    Monastersky R
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7617):386-7. PubMed ID: 27558046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public perceptions of federal science advisory boards depend on their composition.
    Drummond C; Gray SG; Raimi KT; Wilson R; Árvai J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22668-22670. PubMed ID: 32868425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientists, presidents, and pandemics-comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks.
    Safford TG; Whitmore EH; Hamilton LC
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Nov; 102(6):2482-2498. PubMed ID: 34908603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. After Trump, US researchers urge Biden to block political meddling in science.
    Subbaraman N
    Nature; 2021 Aug; 596(7871):174-175. PubMed ID: 34349277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.
    Edwards MA; Roy S
    Environ Eng Sci; 2017 Jan; 34(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 28115824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation protection challenges facing the federal agencies.
    Jones CR
    Health Phys; 2004 Sep; 87(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 15303063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Federal Funding and Citation Metrics of US Biomedical Researchers, 1996 to 2022.
    Ioannidis JPA; Hozo I; Djulbegovic B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Dec; 5(12):e2245590. PubMed ID: 36477476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.
    Rest KM; Halpern MH
    Am J Public Health; 2007 Nov; 97(11):1939-44. PubMed ID: 17901422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits.
    Zhang B; Mildenberger M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.