These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32324825)

  • 1. Influence of transient pressure changes on speech intelligibility: Implications for next-generation train travel.
    Rooney D; Wittkowski M; Bartels S; Weidenfeld S; Aeschbach D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232024. PubMed ID: 32324825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Contribution of Auditory and Cognitive Factors to Intelligibility of Words and Sentences in Noise.
    Heinrich A; Knight S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():37-45. PubMed ID: 27080644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A study on speech intelligibility in traffic noise].
    Asahina N
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Mar; 97(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 8169737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Matrixed Speech-in-Noise Test to Discriminate Favorable Listening Conditions by Means of Intelligibility and Response Time Results.
    Visentin C; Prodi N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 61(6):1497-1516. PubMed ID: 29845187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users.
    Dingemanse JG; Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):360-369. PubMed ID: 29334269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Haythornthwaite C; Riko K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 7085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for older adults with and without hearing loss.
    Ferguson SH; Jongman A; Sereno JA; Keum KA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 20211119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a German reading span test with dual task design for application in cognitive hearing research.
    Carroll R; Meis M; Schulte M; Vormann M; Kießling J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 25195607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.