These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32325567)

  • 1. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
    Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
    Kumar R; Pal P
    Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application.
    Koyuncu I; Topacik D
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15137719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of operating parameters on spiramycin removal by nanofiltration membrane.
    Zhao C; Fan W; Wang T; Hou D; Luan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1512-9. PubMed ID: 24135099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Achieving low concentrations of chromium in drinking water by nanofiltration: membrane performance and selection.
    Giagnorio M; Ruffino B; Grinic D; Steffenino S; Meucci L; Zanetti MC; Tiraferri A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(25):25294-25305. PubMed ID: 29946838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separation of Drugs by Commercial Nanofiltration Membranes and Their Modelling.
    Nayak V; Cuhorka J; Mikulášek P
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35629854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of transmembrane pressure and feed concentration on the retention of arsenic, chromium and cadmium from water by nanofiltration.
    Babaee Y; Mousavi SM; Danesh S; Baratian A
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2010 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid from synthetic water by nanofiltration.
    Yuan J; Duan J; Saint CP; Mulcahy D
    Environ Technol; 2018 Jun; 39(11):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28488926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling of arsenic (III) removal from aqueous solution using film theory combined Spiegler-Kedem model: pilot-scale study.
    Rajendran RM; Garg S; Bajpai S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Mar; 28(11):13886-13899. PubMed ID: 33205270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental and economic evaluation of nitrate removal by a nanofiltration membrane.
    Alavijeh HN; Sadeghi M; Ghahremanfard A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40783-40798. PubMed ID: 36622606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltration of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution.
    Zeng C; Tanaka S; Suzuki Y; Fujii S
    Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():599-604. PubMed ID: 28575703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nitrate removal from groundwater using negatively charged nanofiltration membrane.
    Zou L; Zhang S; Liu J; Cao Y; Qian G; Li YY; Xu ZP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):34197-34204. PubMed ID: 30515691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of solute-solute interactions and cake enhanced concentration polarization during removal of pharmaceuticals from urban wastewater by nanofiltration.
    Azaïs A; Mendret J; Petit E; Brosillon S
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 104():156-167. PubMed ID: 27522026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
    Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of operating conditions on the separation of ammonium and nitrate ions with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Koyuncu I
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2002 Aug; 37(7):1347-59. PubMed ID: 15328697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.