These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3232690)
1. Upgrading occupational epidemiology and standard setting by improved exposure monitoring. Vanhoorne M Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):733-4. PubMed ID: 3232690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cummings Award address. Occupational health standard setting in the United States. Smith RG Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):541-6. PubMed ID: 4061284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Where is the point of no hearing damage? Van Atta FA Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 181709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications for the use of TLVs to clinical occupational medicine practice. Cullen MR Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):679-80. PubMed ID: 2053583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Take a scientific look at the noise hazard. Ward WD Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):32-6. PubMed ID: 181708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Noise is a prime target at OSHA. Corn M Occup Health Saf; 1976; 45(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 181704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to "Corporate Influence on Threshold Limit Values". Elkins HB Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 3232691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health standards and standard setting in the United States. Key MM Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1972 Dec; 200():707-11. PubMed ID: 4513340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protective devices in a hearing conservation program. The rationale and justification of personal hearing protectors. Gosztonyi RE J Occup Med; 1975 Nov; 17(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1195035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Occupational exposure to hazardous agents in enterprises supervised by the State Sanitary Inspection]. Kozajda A; Zielińska-Jankiewicz K Med Pr; 2003; 54(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 14669573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin notation in the context of workplace exposure standards. Scansetti G; Piolatto G; Rubino GF Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 2976578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening of occupational environment: a critique of exposure limits. Pendergrass JA Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1969 Jul; 59(7):1204-8. PubMed ID: 5815759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Status of health inspection in industrial hygiene and its scientific support]. Izmerov NF; Kovshilo VE; Skliarov AM Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1979 Aug; (8):1-4. PubMed ID: 488716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Principles of establishing occupational exposure limits for carcinogens in Poland and in other EU countries]. Skowroń J; Czerczak S Med Pr; 2013; 64(4):541-63. PubMed ID: 24502119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The nature and significance of the corporate influence on threshold limit values. Morton WE Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):721-3. PubMed ID: 3232689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A contribution to the discussion on health checks for workers exposed to carcinogenic substances. Merler E Med Lav; 1986; 77(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 3784960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of hygiene standards. Turner D Ann Occup Hyg; 1976 Nov; 19(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 1008408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing controls for mercury in an industrial environment. Butler MA Occup Health Saf; 1978; 47(6):28-30. PubMed ID: 724187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal and administrative aspects of personnel dosimetry. Hart JC Health Phys; 1972 Sep; 23(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 4264651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]