These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32328083)

  • 1. Comparing Alternative Single-Step GBLUP Approaches and Training Population Designs for Genomic Evaluation of Crossbred Animals.
    Alvarenga AB; Veroneze R; Oliveira HR; Marques DBD; Lopes PS; Silva FF; Brito LF
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():263. PubMed ID: 32328083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic predictions based on haplotypes fitted as pseudo-SNP for milk production and udder type traits and SCS in French dairy goats.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Brito LF; Rupp R; Schenkel FS; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Dec; 103(12):11559-11573. PubMed ID: 33041034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.
    Brzáková M; Bauer J; Steyn Y; Šplíchal J; Fulínová D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36334266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Selection for Bacterial Cold Water Disease Resistance Using Progeny Performance Data in Rainbow Trout: Insights on Genotyping Methods and Genomic Prediction Models.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Fragomeni BO; Gao G; Hernandez AG; Misztal I; Welch TJ; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():96. PubMed ID: 27303436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comprehensive Comparison of Haplotype-Based Single-Step Genomic Predictions in Livestock Populations With Different Genetic Diversity Levels: A Simulation Study.
    Araujo AC; Carneiro PLS; Oliveira HR; Schenkel FS; Veroneze R; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():729867. PubMed ID: 34721524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative methods improve the accuracy of genomic prediction using information from a causal point mutation in a dairy sheep model.
    Oget C; Teissier M; Astruc JM; Tosser-Klopp G; Rupp R
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):719. PubMed ID: 31533617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
    Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighting Strategies for Single-Step Genomic BLUP: An Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of GEBV and GWAS.
    Zhang X; Lourenco D; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Front Genet; 2016; 7():151. PubMed ID: 27594861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
    Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
    Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of genomic breeding values based on pre-selected SNPs using ssGBLUP, WssGBLUP and BayesB for Edwardsiellosis resistance in Japanese flounder.
    Lu S; Liu Y; Yu X; Li Y; Yang Y; Wei M; Zhou Q; Wang J; Zhang Y; Zheng W; Chen S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):49. PubMed ID: 32811444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig.
    Song H; Zhang J; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():730. PubMed ID: 30693018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.