138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32328154)
1. Differentiating Grade in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using Texture Analysis of MRI.
Yuan G; Liu Y; Huang W; Hu B
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():6913418. PubMed ID: 32328154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integration of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and T2-weighted imaging radiomic features by a canonical correlation analysis-based feature fusion method to predict histological grade in ductal breast carcinoma.
Fan M; Liu Z; Xie S; Xu M; Wang S; Gao X; Li L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(21):215001. PubMed ID: 31470420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI texture analysis in differentiating luminal A and luminal B breast cancer molecular subtypes - a feasibility study.
Holli-Helenius K; Salminen A; Rinta-Kiikka I; Koskivuo I; Brück N; Boström P; Parkkola R
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Dec; 17(1):69. PubMed ID: 29284425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer molecular subtype classifier that incorporates MRI features.
Sutton EJ; Dashevsky BZ; Oh JH; Veeraraghavan H; Apte AP; Thakur SB; Morris EA; Deasy JO
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 26756416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research on breast cancer pathological image classification method based on wavelet transform and YOLOv8.
Yang Y; Wang J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(3):677-687. PubMed ID: 38189740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiogenomics of lower-grade gliomas: machine learning-based MRI texture analysis for predicting 1p/19q codeletion status.
Kocak B; Durmaz ES; Ates E; Sel I; Turgut Gunes S; Kaya OK; Zeynalova A; Kilickesmez O
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):877-886. PubMed ID: 31691122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discriminating low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from non-low-grade DCIS or DCIS upgraded to invasive carcinoma: effective texture features on ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Mori N; Abe H; Mugikura S; Miyashita M; Mori Y; Oguma Y; Hirasawa M; Sato S; Takase K
Breast Cancer; 2021 Sep; 28(5):1141-1153. PubMed ID: 33900583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Support vector machine for breast cancer classification using diffusion-weighted MRI histogram features: Preliminary study.
Vidić I; Egnell L; Jerome NP; Teruel JR; Sjøbakk TE; Østlie A; Fjøsne HE; Bathen TF; Goa PE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1205-1216. PubMed ID: 29044896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating benign and malignant mass and non-mass lesions in breast DCE-MRI using normalized frequency-based features.
Ayatollahi F; Shokouhi SB; Teuwen J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Feb; 15(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31838643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Cancer Calcifications: Identification Using a Novel Segmentation Approach.
Chaudhury S; Rakhra M; Memon N; Sau K; Ayana MT
Comput Math Methods Med; 2021; 2021():9905808. PubMed ID: 34659451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning analysis of breast MRIs for prediction of occult invasive disease in ductal carcinoma in situ.
Zhu Z; Harowicz M; Zhang J; Saha A; Grimm LJ; Hwang ES; Mazurowski MA
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Dec; 115():103498. PubMed ID: 31698241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Accuracy of Breast MR Imaging for Measuring the Size of a Breast Cancer: Analysis of the Histopathologic Factors.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(6):e145-e152. PubMed ID: 27566960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study.
Yu Y; He Z; Ouyang J; Tan Y; Chen Y; Gu Y; Mao L; Ren W; Wang J; Lin L; Wu Z; Liu J; Ou Q; Hu Q; Li A; Chen K; Li C; Lu N; Li X; Su F; Liu Q; Xie C; Yao H
EBioMedicine; 2021 Jul; 69():103460. PubMed ID: 34233259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiomics Analysis on Ultrasound for Prediction of Biologic Behavior in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.
Guo Y; Hu Y; Qiao M; Wang Y; Yu J; Li J; Chang C
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e335-e344. PubMed ID: 28890183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Voxel-based clustered imaging by multiparameter diffusion tensor images for glioma grading.
Inano R; Oishi N; Kunieda T; Arakawa Y; Yamao Y; Shibata S; Kikuchi T; Fukuyama H; Miyamoto S
Neuroimage Clin; 2014; 5():396-407. PubMed ID: 25180159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging biomarker analysis of advanced multiparametric MRI for glioma grading.
Vamvakas A; Williams SC; Theodorou K; Kapsalaki E; Fountas K; Kappas C; Vassiou K; Tsougos I
Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():188-198. PubMed ID: 30910431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of breast tumors using machine learning based upon multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging features.
Thakran S; Gupta RK; Singh A
NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4665. PubMed ID: 34962326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of MRI and clinicopathologic features in predicting the invasive component of biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yoon GY; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY; Kim HH
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):95. PubMed ID: 32787871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Roknsharifi S; Fishman MDC; Agarwal MD; Brook A; Kharbanda V; Dialani V
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):923-929. PubMed ID: 30293819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel computer-aided diagnosis system for breast MRI based on feature selection and ensemble learning.
Lu W; Li Z; Chu J
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Apr; 83():157-165. PubMed ID: 28282591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
