138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32328154)
41. Automatic T1 bladder tumor detection by using wavelet analysis in cystoscopy images.
Freitas NR; Vieira PM; Lima E; Lima CS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035031. PubMed ID: 29271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ependymoma and pilocytic astrocytoma: Differentiation using radiomics approach based on machine learning.
Li M; Wang H; Shang Z; Yang Z; Zhang Y; Wan H
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 78():175-180. PubMed ID: 32336636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Breast cancer characterization based on image classification of tissue sections visualized under low magnification.
Loukas C; Kostopoulos S; Tanoglidi A; Glotsos D; Sfikas C; Cavouras D
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():829461. PubMed ID: 24069067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey.
Nahid AA; Kong Y
Comput Math Methods Med; 2017; 2017():3781951. PubMed ID: 29463985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Glioma grading using a machine-learning framework based on optimized features obtained from T
Sengupta A; Ramaniharan AK; Gupta RK; Agarwal S; Singh A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1295-1306. PubMed ID: 30895704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Automatic segmentation and classification of breast lesions through identification of informative multiparametric PET/MRI features.
Vogl WD; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Bago-Horvath Z; Dubsky P; Langs G
Eur Radiol Exp; 2019 Apr; 3(1):18. PubMed ID: 31030291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks-Based Automatic Breast Segmentation and Mass Detection in DCE-MRI.
Jiao H; Jiang X; Pang Z; Lin X; Huang Y; Li L
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():2413706. PubMed ID: 32454879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. An Intelligent Diagnosis Method of Brain MRI Tumor Segmentation Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network and SVM Algorithm.
Wu W; Li D; Du J; Gao X; Gu W; Zhao F; Feng X; Yan H
Comput Math Methods Med; 2020; 2020():6789306. PubMed ID: 32733596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Computed Tomography Texture Analysis for Prediction of Fuhrman Nuclear Grade.
Bektas CT; Kocak B; Yardimci AH; Turkcanoglu MH; Yucetas U; Koca SB; Erdim C; Kilickesmez O
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 30167812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Independent validation of machine learning in diagnosing breast Cancer on magnetic resonance imaging within a single institution.
Ji Y; Li H; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Ma W; Liu P; Giger ML
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Sep; 19(1):64. PubMed ID: 31533838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of statistical, LBP, and multi-resolution analysis features for breast mass classification.
Reyad YA; Berbar MA; Hussain M
J Med Syst; 2014 Sep; 38(9):100. PubMed ID: 25037713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation.
Kocak B; Yardimci AH; Bektas CT; Turkcanoglu MH; Erdim C; Yucetas U; Koca SB; Kilickesmez O
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():149-157. PubMed ID: 30292260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An expert support system for breast cancer diagnosis using color wavelet features.
Issac Niwas S; Palanisamy P; Chibbar R; Zhang WJ
J Med Syst; 2012 Oct; 36(5):3091-102. PubMed ID: 22005900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: MR Imaging Texture Analysis and Survival Outcomes.
Kim JH; Ko ES; Lim Y; Lee KS; Han BK; Ko EY; Hahn SY; Nam SJ
Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):665-675. PubMed ID: 27700229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A knowledge-driven feature learning and integration method for breast cancer diagnosis on multi-sequence MRI.
Feng H; Cao J; Wang H; Xie Y; Yang D; Feng J; Chen B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jun; 69():40-48. PubMed ID: 32173583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Classification of scattering media within benign and malignant breast tumors based on ultrasound texture-feature-based and Nakagami-parameter images.
Liao YY; Tsui PH; Li CH; Chang KJ; Kuo WH; Chang CC; Yeh CK
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2198-207. PubMed ID: 21626954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Automated quantitative analysis of Ki-67 staining and HE images recognition and registration based on whole tissue sections in breast carcinoma.
Feng M; Deng Y; Yang L; Jing Q; Zhang Z; Xu L; Wei X; Zhou Y; Wu D; Xiang F; Wang Y; Bao J; Bu H
Diagn Pathol; 2020 May; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 32471471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
