BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32329355)

  • 1. Who Uses Wearable Activity Trackers and Why? A Comparison of Former and Current Users in the United States.
    Friel CP; Garber CE
    Am J Health Promot; 2020 Sep; 34(7):762-769. PubMed ID: 32329355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.
    Maher C; Ryan J; Ambrosi C; Edney S
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):880. PubMed ID: 29141607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The frequency of using wearable activity trackers is associated with minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity among cancer survivors: Analysis of HINTS data.
    De La Torre SA; Pickering T; Spruijt-Metz D; Farias AJ
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102491. PubMed ID: 38042129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physical Activity Surveillance Through Smartphone Apps and Wearable Trackers: Examining the UK Potential for Nationally Representative Sampling.
    Strain T; Wijndaele K; Brage S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e11898. PubMed ID: 30694198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associations Among Wearable Activity Tracker Use, Exercise Motivation, and Physical Activity in a Cohort of Cancer Survivors: Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.
    De La Torre S; Spruijt-Metz D; Farias AJ
    JMIR Cancer; 2021 Apr; 7(2):e24828. PubMed ID: 33843595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors Associated with Older Adults' Long-Term Use of Wearable Activity Trackers.
    Li L; Peng W; Kononova A; Bowen M; Cotten SR
    Telemed J E Health; 2020 Jun; 26(6):769-775. PubMed ID: 31553281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reciprocal Reinforcement Between Wearable Activity Trackers and Social Network Services in Influencing Physical Activity Behaviors.
    Chang RC; Lu HP; Yang P; Luarn P
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jul; 4(3):e84. PubMed ID: 27380798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
    Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical Activity Surveillance Using Wearable Activity Monitors: Are US Adults Willing to Share Their Data?
    Hyde ET; Omura JD; Fulton JE; Weldy A; Carlson SA
    Am J Health Promot; 2020 Jul; 34(6):672-676. PubMed ID: 31957481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors' acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers.
    Nguyen NH; Hadgraft NT; Moore MM; Rosenberg DE; Lynch C; Reeves MM; Lynch BM
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3375-3384. PubMed ID: 28540402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anxious or empowered? A cross-sectional study exploring how wearable activity trackers make their owners feel.
    Ryan J; Edney S; Maher C
    BMC Psychol; 2019 Jul; 7(1):42. PubMed ID: 31269972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
    Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social Factors and Older Adults' Use of Wearable Activity Trackers: Before and During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Li M; Huang J; Budhathoki C; Li Q; Samuel L; Szanton SL; Schrack JA; Li J
    J Appl Gerontol; 2024 Feb; 43(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 37863099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
    Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data.
    Rising CJ; Gaysynsky A; Blake KD; Jensen RE; Oh A
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e29190. PubMed ID: 34898448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clusters of Adolescent Physical Activity Tracker Patterns and Their Associations With Physical Activity Behaviors in Finland and Ireland: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ng K; Kokko S; Tammelin T; Kallio J; Belton S; O'Brien W; Murphy M; Powell C; Woods C
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e18509. PubMed ID: 32667894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey.
    Alley S; Schoeppe S; Guertler D; Jennings C; Duncan MJ; Vandelanotte C
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011243. PubMed ID: 27388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with long-term wearable physical activity monitor user engagement.
    Friel CP; Cornelius T; Diaz KM
    Transl Behav Med; 2021 Feb; 11(1):262-269. PubMed ID: 31671174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review.
    Shin G; Jarrahi MH; Fei Y; Karami A; Gafinowitz N; Byun A; Lu X
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 May; 93():103153. PubMed ID: 30910623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.