These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 323296)

  • 1. Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP; Malnick H
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Apr; 30(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 323296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 6365981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification.
    Leighton PM; Little JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system.
    Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP
    J Clin Pathol; 1978 Jan; 31(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 342546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Nord CE; Lindberg AA; Dahlbäck A
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1974 Mar; 159(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 4830936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Identification of the enterobacteria isolated from patients by using the Enterotube test system].
    Men'shikov DD; Ianisker GIa
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1979 Feb; (2):73-7. PubMed ID: 369245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the redesigned enterotube--a system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Tomfohrde KM; Rhoden DL; Smith PB; Balows A
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Feb; 25(2):301-4. PubMed ID: 4571661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
    Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of a multitest system (Enterotube) for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Titsworth E; Grunberg E; Beskid G; Cleeland R; Delorenzo WF
    Appl Microbiol; 1969 Aug; 18(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 4979941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of enterobacteriaceae identification systems. An analysis of College of American Pathologists Survey data.
    Marymont JH; Marymont JH; Gavan TL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Sep; 70(3 Suppl):539-47. PubMed ID: 360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Martin WJ; Yu PK; Washington JA
    Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jul; 22(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 4939124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
    Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of biotypes using enterotubes.
    Kilbourn JP; Nyiendo J
    Am J Med Technol; 1979 May; 45(5):355-60. PubMed ID: 375727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.