These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 323296)

  • 21. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility of the analytab (API 20E) system.
    Butler DA; Lobregat CM; Gavan TL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1102558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misuse and interlaboratory test reproducibility of API 20E system.
    Holmes B; Dawson CA
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Aug; 38(8):937-41. PubMed ID: 3897293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative accuracy of five biochemical systems for identifying Salmonella and related foodborne bacteria: collaborative study.
    Poelma PL; Romero A; Andrews WH
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1978 Sep; 61(5):1043-9. PubMed ID: 363676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Use of microsystems for the identification of Enterbacteria in the microbiological laboratory: comments on technics and identification procedures].
    Ottaviani F; Aliani A; Benetti L; Viero B
    Ann Sclavo; 1976; 18(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 800723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of a small "conventional" identification system for fermentative gramnegative rods using a computerized data base.
    Siegrist HH; Altwegg M; Wenger A; Isenrich H; von Graevenitz A
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Oct; 266(3-4):370-8. PubMed ID: 3326369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time-motion and cost comparison study of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional biochemical testing in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Bale MJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Dec; 14(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 6801085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Simple method of differentiation of intestinal bacteria by the Enterotube-Roche test].
    Drozdzewska-Swierczek E; Koterwa A
    Wiad Lek; 1973 Nov; 26(21):1985-9. PubMed ID: 4587346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.
    Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of three methods of identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Rutherford I; Moody V; Gavan TL; Ayers LW; Taylor DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 5(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 323287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.