These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Aggregating predictions from experts: a review of statistical methods, experiments, and applications. McAndrew T; Wattanachit N; Gibson GC; Reich NG Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat; 2021; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33777310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Epilepsyecosystem.org: crowd-sourcing reproducible seizure prediction with long-term human intracranial EEG. Kuhlmann L; Karoly P; Freestone DR; Brinkmann BH; Temko A; Barachant A; Li F; Titericz G; Lang BW; Lavery D; Roman K; Broadhead D; Dobson S; Jones G; Tang Q; Ivanenko I; Panichev O; Proix T; Náhlík M; Grunberg DB; Reuben C; Worrell G; Litt B; Liley DTJ; Grayden DB; Cook MJ Brain; 2018 Sep; 141(9):2619-2630. PubMed ID: 30101347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Case studies on forecasting for innovative technologies: frequent revisions improve accuracy. Lerner JC; Robertson DC; Goldstein SM Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Feb; 34(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 25646112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts. Morewedge CK; Buechel EC Emotion; 2013 Dec; 13(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23914762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selection procedures in sports: Improving predictions of athletes' future performance. Den Hartigh RJR; Niessen ASM; Frencken WGP; Meijer RR Eur J Sport Sci; 2018 Oct; 18(9):1191-1198. PubMed ID: 29856681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A strategy to improve expert technology forecasts. Savage T; Davis A; Fischhoff B; Morgan MG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(21):. PubMed ID: 33990418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Overcorrection for Social-Categorization Information Moderates Impact Bias in Affective Forecasting. Lau T; Morewedge CK; Cikara M Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1340-1351. PubMed ID: 27538410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors. Buechel EC; Zhang J; Morewedge CK J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):746-761. PubMed ID: 28368193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A framework for evaluating epidemic forecasts. Tabataba FS; Chakraborty P; Ramakrishnan N; Venkatramanan S; Chen J; Lewis B; Marathe M BMC Infect Dis; 2017 May; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28506278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Zoltar forecast archive, a tool to standardize and store interdisciplinary prediction research. Reich NG; Cornell M; Ray EL; House K; Le K Sci Data; 2021 Feb; 8(1):59. PubMed ID: 33574342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Wisdom of the expert crowd prediction of response for 3 neurology randomized trials. Atanasov P; Diamantaras A; MacPherson A; Vinarov E; Benjamin DM; Shrier I; Paul F; Dirnagl U; Kimmelman J Neurology; 2020 Aug; 95(5):e488-e498. PubMed ID: 32546652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Testing the Value of Probability Forecasts for Calibrated Combining. Lahiri K; Peng H; Zhao Y Int J Forecast; 2015 Jan; 31(1):113-129. PubMed ID: 25530646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]