These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32330506)

  • 1. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association Between Endoscopist Annual Procedure Volume and Colonoscopy Quality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Forbes N; Boyne DJ; Mazurek MS; Hilsden RJ; Sutherland RL; Pader J; Ruan Y; Shaheen AA; Wong C; Lamidi M; Lorenzetti DL; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 18(10):2192-2208.e12. PubMed ID: 32240836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Endoscopist Specialty and Colonoscopy Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazurek M; Murray A; Heitman SJ; Ruan Y; Antoniou SA; Boyne D; Murthy S; Baxter NN; Datta I; Shorr R; Ma C; Swain MG; Hilsden RJ; Brenner DR; Forbes N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Sep; 20(9):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 34450297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.
    Kawamura T; Sekiguchi M; Takamaru H; Mizuguchi Y; Horiguchi G; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Kobayashi K; Sada M; Oda Y; Yokoyama A; Utsumi T; Tsuji Y; Ohki D; Takeuchi Y; Shichijo S; Ikematsu H; Matsuda K; Teramukai S; Kobayashi N; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Tanaka K
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 37953649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rates: Outcomes of quality improvement program.
    Gurudu SR; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Atia M; Umar SB; Leighton JA; Faigel DO; Ramirez FC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):645-649. PubMed ID: 28892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of study design on adenoma detection in the evaluation of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee MCM; Parker CH; Liu LWC; Farahvash A; Jeyalingam T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 May; 99(5):676-687.e16. PubMed ID: 38272274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association of colonoscopy quality indicators with the detection of screen-relevant lesions, adverse events, and postcolonoscopy cancers in an asymptomatic Canadian colorectal cancer screening population.
    Hilsden RJ; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Rostom A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):887-94. PubMed ID: 25952092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of fellow involvement on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tziatzios G; Gkolfakis P; Triantafyllou K
    Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Aug; 51(8):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 31272937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of efficacy of colonoscopy between the morning and afternoon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Zhao SB; Wang SL; Fang J; Xia T; Su XJ; Xu C; Li ZS; Bai Y
    Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Jul; 50(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 29776746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.