These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32330506)

  • 21. Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mohan BP; Khan SR; Daugherty E; Chandan S; Ponnada S; Facciorusso A; Kassab LL; Asokkumar R; Adler DG
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Aug; 96(2):208-222.e14. PubMed ID: 35413330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of a Citywide Benchmarking Intervention on Colonoscopy Quality Performance.
    Uche-Anya EN; Brown JJ; Asumeng C; Striplin J; Carlesimo M; Krauskopf M; Greenwald D; Bernstein B; Itzkowitz S; Schnoll-Sussman F; Lebwohl B
    Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(9):2534-2541. PubMed ID: 32036513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
    Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.
    Saini SD; Schoenfeld P; Vijan S
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(7):1856-62. PubMed ID: 23456494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
    Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative Efficacies of Interventions to Improve the Quality of Screening-Related Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Khan R; Ruan Y; Yuan Y; Khalaf K; Sabrie NS; Gimpaya N; Scaffidi MA; Bansal R; Vaska M; Brenner DR; Hilsden RJ; Heitman SJ; Leontiadis GI; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastroenterology; 2024 Aug; 167(3):560-590. PubMed ID: 38513744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual feedback and monitoring of endoscopist performance improves the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a prospective case-control study.
    Ishibashi F; Fukushima K; Kobayashi K; Kawakami T; Tanaka R; Kato J; Sato A; Konda K; Sugihara K; Baba S
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2566-2575. PubMed ID: 32468263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.
    Sapci I; Aiello A; Gorgun E; Rizk M; Delaney CP; Steele SR; Valente MA
    Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):442-444. PubMed ID: 30268418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incidence of interval colorectal cancer attributable to an endoscopist in clinical practice.
    Ertem FU; Ladabaum U; Mehrotra A; Tehranian S; Shi Z; Saul M; Morris M; Crockett SD; Schoen RE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Oct; 88(4):705-711.e1. PubMed ID: 29803767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial.
    Kaminski MF; Anderson J; Valori R; Kraszewska E; Rupinski M; Pachlewski J; Wronska E; Bretthauer M; Thomas-Gibson S; Kuipers EJ; Regula J
    Gut; 2016 Apr; 65(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 25670810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy.
    Wang S; Kim AS; Church TR; Perdue DG; Shaukat A
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1560-E1565. PubMed ID: 33140011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
    Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endoscopic technological innovations for neoplasia detection in organized colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Thayalasekaran S; Frazzoni L; Antonelli G; Fuccio L; Radaelli F; Andrealli A; Senore C; Repici A; Hassan C; Bhandari P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Oct; 92(4):840-847.e9. PubMed ID: 32590053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
    Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What are the priority quality indicators for colonoscopy in real-world clinical practice?
    Tiankanon K; Aniwan S
    Dig Endosc; 2024 Jan; 36(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 37422906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 9-Minute Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rate Compared With 6-Minute Withdrawal Time During Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Aziz M; Haghbin H; Gangwani MK; Nawras M; Nawras Y; Dahiya DS; Sohail AH; Lee-Smith W; Kamal F; Shaukat A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 37389958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.