These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32331884)

  • 1. Symposium review: How to implement genomic selection.
    VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5291-5301. PubMed ID: 32331884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
    Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Tooker ME; Chud TCS; Norman HD; Megonigal JH; Haagen IW; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1620-1631. PubMed ID: 31837783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practical implications for genetic modeling in the genomics era.
    VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2405-2412. PubMed ID: 26778313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
    Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.
    van den Berg I; Meuwissen THE; MacLeod IM; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3155-3174. PubMed ID: 30738664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review: Genomics of bull fertility.
    Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; Sutovsky P
    Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(s1):s172-s183. PubMed ID: 29618393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low-density marker panels.
    Zhang Z; Ding X; Liu J; Zhang Q; de Koning DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3642-50. PubMed ID: 21700054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.