67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32332032)
1. Modeling the Balance of Benefits and Harms of Cervical Cancer Screening with Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing.
Malagón T; Mayrand MH; Ogilvie G; Gotlieb WH; Blake J; Bouchard C; Franco EL; Kulasingam S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1436-1446. PubMed ID: 32332032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Kim JJ; Burger EA; Regan C; Sy S
JAMA; 2018 Aug; 320(7):706-714. PubMed ID: 30140882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How will transitioning from cytology to HPV testing change the balance between the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening? Estimates of the impact on cervical cancer, treatment rates and adverse obstetric outcomes in Australia, a high vaccination coverage country.
Velentzis LS; Caruana M; Simms KT; Lew JB; Shi JF; Saville M; Smith MA; Lord SJ; Tan J; Bateson D; Quinn M; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2017 Dec; 141(12):2410-2422. PubMed ID: 28801947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated, HPV-negative women: a modelling study.
Malagón T; Kulasingam S; Mayrand MH; Ogilvie G; Smith L; Bouchard C; Gotlieb W; Franco EL
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 30392810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Vaccinated Against Human Papillomavirus.
Kim JJ; Burger EA; Sy S; Campos NG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Feb; 109(2):. PubMed ID: 27754955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.
Jin XW; Lipold L; Foucher J; Sikon A; Brainard J; Belinson J; Schramm S; Nottingham K; Hu B; Rothberg MB
J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 31(11):1338-1344. PubMed ID: 27418345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for cervical cancer: a modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Kulasingam SL; Havrilesky LJ; Ghebre R; Myers ER
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Apr; 17(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 23519288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the performance of three different cervical cancer screening modalities in a large prospective population-based cohort.
Song F; Du H; Xiao A; Wang C; Huang X; Liu Z; Zhao M; Men H; Wu R
J Infect Public Health; 2020 Nov; 13(11):1780-1786. PubMed ID: 32919932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical Cancer Screening: Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear Test, Liquid-Based Cytology, and Human Papillomavirus Testing as Stand-alone or Cotesting Strategies.
Liang LA; Einzmann T; Franzen A; Schwarzer K; Schauberger G; Schriefer D; Radde K; Zeissig SR; Ikenberg H; Meijer CJLM; Kirkpatrick CJ; Kölbl H; Blettner M; Klug SJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Mar; 30(3):474-484. PubMed ID: 33187968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing to augment cervical cancer screening in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.
Goldie SJ; Freedberg KA; Weinstein MC; Wright TC; Kuntz KM
Am J Med; 2001 Aug; 111(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 11498068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
; Curry SJ; Krist AH; Owens DK; Barry MJ; Caughey AB; Davidson KW; Doubeni CA; Epling JW; Kemper AR; Kubik M; Landefeld CS; Mangione CM; Phipps MG; Silverstein M; Simon MA; Tseng CW; Wong JB
JAMA; 2018 Aug; 320(7):674-686. PubMed ID: 30140884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The potential harms of primary human papillomavirus screening in over-screened women: a microsimulation study.
Naber SK; de Kok IM; Matthijsse SM; van Ballegooijen M
Cancer Causes Control; 2016 Apr; 27(4):569-81. PubMed ID: 26970740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Angelis E; Kaufmann A; Skenderi A; Jansen-Duerr P; Lekka I; Kilintzis V; Angelidou S; Katsiki E; Hagemann I; Tsertanidou A; Koch I; Boecher O; Soutschek E; Maglaveras N; Agorastos T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 28337594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening among non-attenders in Switzerland: The transition towards HPV-based screening.
Catarino R; Vassilakos P; Petignat P; Combescure C
Prev Med Rep; 2022 Oct; 29():101929. PubMed ID: 35959498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Triage human papillomavirus testing for cytology-based cervical screening in women of different ages in primary hospitals: A retrospective clinical study.
Zhang YY; Xu XQ; Zhang D; Wu J; Zhang HX
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(38):e22320. PubMed ID: 32957398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.
Berkhof J; Coupé VM; Bogaards JA; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 127(9):2147-58. PubMed ID: 20112339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact on women's health and the cervical cancer screening budget of primary HPV screening with dual-stain cytology triage in Belgium.
Tjalma WAA; Kim E; Vandeweyer K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 May; 212():171-181. PubMed ID: 28081908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer. A review of recent modelling studies.
Holmes J; Hemmett L; Garfield S
Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 6(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 15682286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
